The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-22
, 23:55
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2472
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 00:30
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#2473
|
Here's the question: is Sammy the only major player to target this market with this class of device?
RIM seems to have abandoned the enterprise with the playbook... Even the name seems targeted towards the average consumer. It's as if RIM is trying to separate itself from the enterprise.
Apple is clearly targeting the general consumer with the iPad. Motorola, HP et. al. seem to also target this segment.
Who's left?
There's tons of money to be made over generations of devices (by virtue of being adopted), and I bet that Samsung knows it -- RIM exploits this characteristic. Differentiating the Tab sizes is a brilliant move as they have an in for the enterprise without compromising the Tab brand.
Were I a CEO, this would make a compelling solution.
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 01:08
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2474
|
I agree.. and it's a very smart move. Business NEEDS something like this--and this is RIGHT up my alley. THIS is where I like to live--in the business solutions biz. I think Samsung is clearly becoming a driver for Android now (as if the move from HTC-made devices to Samsung-made devices for the Google flagship phones isn't indication enough).
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 01:12
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2475
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 02:10
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#2476
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 02:13
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#2477
|
So what's the difference between 8.9 and 10.1 version, other than the screen size and battery capacity?
And btw.... goodness, couldn't (and shouldn't) they just round the model numbers as Tab 9 and Tab 10.
|
2011-03-23
, 03:36
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#2478
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 04:46
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#2479
|
I get it.. it's to establish numerical superiority...
I can imagine the iterations... Tab2, Tab2 8.9 and Tab2 10.1... by then they'll probably have figured out another optimal form factor: Tab 6.3.
Looking at this set of model names, I think Jobs may have stuck with a single form factor for iPad just to stay away from all this confusion.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 05:50
|
Posts: 422 |
Thanked: 244 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#2480
|
Looking at this set of model names, I think Jobs may have stuck with a single form factor for iPad just to stay away from all this confusion.
Tags |
android envy, buzz..buzz buzz, core failure, crapdroid, galaxy fap, galaxy tab, ipad killer, samsung, tab trolls, tablet envy |
|
RIM seems to have abandoned the enterprise with the playbook... Even the name seems targeted towards the average consumer. It's as if RIM is trying to separate itself from the enterprise.
Apple is clearly targeting the general consumer with the iPad. Motorola, HP et. al. seem to also target this segment.
Who's left?
There's tons of money to be made over generations of devices (by virtue of being adopted), and I bet that Samsung knows it -- RIM exploits this characteristic. Differentiating the Tab sizes is a brilliant move as they have an in for the enterprise without compromising the Tab brand.
Were I a CEO, this would make a compelling solution.