|
2011-03-24
, 19:29
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2552
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-24
, 19:37
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2553
|
|
2011-03-24
, 19:45
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2554
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Capt'n Corrupt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-24
, 20:08
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#2555
|
I probably should have included a bit of an explanation.
Back in the dark days when I was running Windows, I used Anti-virus software due to the known vulnerabilities of the system, yet I never once got a virus. In the end, my personal usage policies were enough protection; eg. multiple firewalls, use only trusted software, use software I'm confident is secure (eg. chrome vs. IE), use few programs, one trusted user (me), etc. While Android is certain to have its vulnerabilities, I'm confident that this system will remain secure in my sober, calculated use.
I personally don't feel that anti-virus software would help me on Linux based Android, based on the way that I am likely to use the software, and what I [think I] know of the system. This is an ignorant viewpoint, I know, though as far as I'm aware, the majority of android attacks are trojan APKs with permission settings that don't seem to make sense (eg. wallpaper that requires access to your contacts).
But perhaps you could offer a compelling reason why anti-virus software should be strongly considered or even a scenario, and I'll reconsider.
http://www.informationweek.com/news/development/mobility/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=229400097
I love this. As soon as they taste a bit of success, they're going to go stab their partners and crash into another self-destruction binge.
Woah, I didn't know Samsung had such a functional app store. Anyway it seems to have pushed through 100M apps.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/s...ion-downloads/
This is quite impressive, and about 10% of Apple's sell through numbers, especially considering that it only has 13,000 apps!
Samsung is driving for the hoop.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-24
, 20:19
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#2556
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-24
, 20:31
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2557
|
|
2011-03-24
, 20:33
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2558
|
For one, identifying said trojans would be a good reason alone--but you should also consider zero-day exploits. So long as you can root a device, you also have exploits (the two go hand-in-hand). rageagainstthecage is how Droid people root their handsets, but it's also precisely how that last HUGE bunch of trojans also managed to quietly root and take hold.
|
2011-03-24
, 21:26
|
|
Posts: 355 |
Thanked: 245 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ Northern VA
|
#2559
|
|
2011-03-24
, 21:33
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#2560
|
Quick question: did rageagainstthecage also require you to accept permissions upon installation, or was it an exploit that moonlighted as a low-permission app only to gain root perms?
The one I have found a close fit for my immediate needs is the Motorola Cliq 2. The only dawback I have seen is the motoblur feature. So I guess my question is how difficult is rooting the phone to get rid of this feature if Im used to reflashing the N900. I would go with the Desire Z but its a little out of my price range for a 2nd phone
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
android envy, buzz..buzz buzz, core failure, crapdroid, galaxy fap, galaxy tab, ipad killer, samsung, tab trolls, tablet envy |
|