Active Topics
-
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 9 hrs ago -
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 2 days, 5 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 2 days, 17 hrs ago -
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 6 days, 17 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2013-11-28
, 13:32
|
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 239 times |
Joined on Sep 2013
|
#252
|
@att yep. There is no zypper by default... I didnt know about that.
You can install zypper by
You can install zypper by
Code:
pkcon install zypper
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SourenAraya For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2013-11-28
, 17:14
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#253
|
Has anyone considered the legality of all this?
Among other things it violates the SDK license. I don't have the device at hand but I presume it violates its software license too.
Among other things it violates the SDK license. I don't have the device at hand but I presume it violates its software license too.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2013-11-28
, 17:17
|
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 506 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ Argentina
|
#254
|
I don't really know how licenses are but, we are not selling nothing
|
|
2013-11-28
, 17:18
|
|
Posts: 728 |
Thanked: 1,217 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#255
|
Originally Posted by flotron
I always thought that so long as you don't commercialise it, you can do whatever you want. You can download the firmware of your CD player, alter it, upload it again at your own risk. If it's within the privacy of your home, it is all good.
I don't really know how licenses are but, we are not selling nothing
Now, in this thread the discussion is hypothetical, as you know, so nobody is actually doing anything :-)
 |
|
2013-11-28
, 17:32
|
|
Posts: 1,055 |
Thanked: 4,107 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Norway
|
#256
|
Originally Posted by javispedro
What is violating which license in particular, in your opinion?
Has anyone considered the legality of all this?
Among other things it violates the SDK license. I don't have the device at hand but I presume it violates its software license too.
(Maybe we need to revisit some things...)
__________________
i'm a Qt expert and former Jolla sailor (forever sailing, in spirit).
if you like, read more about me.
if you find me entertaining, or useful, thank me. if you don't, then tell me why.
i'm a Qt expert and former Jolla sailor (forever sailing, in spirit).
if you like, read more about me.
if you find me entertaining, or useful, thank me. if you don't, then tell me why.
|
|
2013-11-28
, 22:47
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#257
|
Originally Posted by w00t
The problem is that the SailfishOS.license is basically indistinguishable from a standard EULA. Among other things, it paraphrases the usual "Purpose" clause that is present on many other EULAs and for example the EULA for the Maemo SDK:
What is violating which license in particular, in your opinion?
(Maybe we need to revisit some things...)
The Software is made accessible to you, free of charge, for the sole purpose of developing and testing your Applications.
One might argue that Jolla will never sue individuals hacking this this way, but:
a) This is unfair versus projects that use actual OSS licenses,
b) Jolla today is a different entity from the Jolla of tomorrow, which could go berserk, be bought by Oracle, or for any other reason decide to start sueing everyone.
Please correct if wrong.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2013-11-28
, 23:11
|
|
Posts: 741 |
Thanked: 900 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Auckland NZ
|
#258
|
Jolla's CEO and top brass have said in countless interviews over the last few days that they encourage people to install Sailfish on their non-Jolla devices. They have also in the past month retweeted a picture of the first N9 to run the SDK build and tried to explain to people that are not offering official Jolla support for the N9. Why is it so hard for people to get over this?
I think the beef comes from a lot of people who expect Jolla to simply roll out an installable build for the N9. Jolla is not Nokia. Jolla didn't sell you the N9 and they don't owe you anything. It's hard enough for them to put out 1 device of their own.
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/403456905743327232
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/403160585174409218
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/405639730282242048
I think the beef comes from a lot of people who expect Jolla to simply roll out an installable build for the N9. Jolla is not Nokia. Jolla didn't sell you the N9 and they don't owe you anything. It's hard enough for them to put out 1 device of their own.
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/403456905743327232
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/403160585174409218
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/405639730282242048
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to maluka For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-11-29
, 03:01
|
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 506 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ Argentina
|
#259
|
Originally Posted by maluka
Ok, Jolla encourages the port, lets move on
Jolla's CEO and top brass have said in countless interviews over the last few days that they encourage people to install Sailfish on their non-Jolla devices. They have also in the past month retweeted a picture of the first N9 to run the SDK build and tried to explain to people that are not offering official Jolla support for the N9. Why is it so hard for people to get over this?
I think the beef comes from a lot of people who expect Jolla to simply roll out an installable build for the N9. Jolla is not Nokia. Jolla didn't sell you the N9 and they don't owe you anything. It's hard enough for them to put out 1 device of their own.
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/403456905743327232
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/403160585174409218
https://twitter.com/JollaHQ/status/405639730282242048
 |
|
2013-11-30
, 09:12
|
|
Posts: 411 |
Thanked: 302 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Australia
|
#260
|
Read back a bit.. others are trying to help the user who has the jolla get the dump :P
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DJJonosound For This Useful Post: | ||
Back to original: The error message is "zypper: command not found", so it seems that zypper is not available on Jolla. It seems that terminal was somehow messing with the lines because earlier it seemed that the error message was "zypper: command not foundd permission not allowed" but it probably was combination of multiple lines (the double d).
Sorry about the confusion.