Overclock the N900? - Page 262 - maemo.org

Active Topics

The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 3 hrs, 1 min ago
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 15 hrs ago
more...

Page 262 of 536

262

Thread Tools

arbitrabbit	2010-04-13 , 11:27
Posts: 171 \| Thanked: 114 times \| Joined on Feb 2010	#2611

Originally Posted by titan

I'd rather have an automatic reboot loop detection.
for example, it could check for a file /etc/lastboot:
if it doesn't exist, create i
if it exists its modification time is < 2min ago it would only apply stock settings,
otherwise create/update it and apply user settings.

the only problem: brokenbox..er..busybux does not have "stat -t", find doesnt support
--mmin. how can we compare file times?

Using awk. systime() and ls -l to get modification time and then using strftime to compare the two

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to arbitrabbit For This Useful Post:
Faz

gabby131	2010-04-13 , 11:33
Posts: 1,729 \| Thanked: 388 times \| Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada	#2612

Originally Posted by shrubbery

First off - a big thank you to everyone who has contributed to the N900 overclocking scene

Would somebody mind explaining why the titan ideal kernel has the min and max frequencies set to 500 and 850 respectively? (instead of say 250 and 1000) Does the 500MHz idle mode not consume more power then than 250MHz?

well the low 125mhz has encountered some problems to some people,

i use a different kernel but i hve 125/900mhz voltage, so far everything is fine

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to gabby131 For This Useful Post:
shrubbery

titan	2010-04-13 , 11:35
Posts: 946 \| Thanked: 1,650 times \| Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany	#2613

for script authors: please add your email or TMO account URL to the script.
I don't want to receive support requests for them. thanks

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to titan For This Useful Post:
firstknight

nokian-series	2010-04-13 , 11:52
Posts: 169 \| Thanked: 41 times \| Joined on Apr 2010 @ Portugal	#2614

Originally Posted by nokian-series

What are your\correct values for it?

Here http://wiki.maemo.org/Overclocking it says the default config to 'pmconfig file' .

It says:
clocks_off_while_idle 1
voltage_off_while_idle 1

But i have:
clocks_off_while_idle 0
voltage_off_while_idle 0

Please Anyone can help me?

Again..What the meaning of those values? Should i change them to 1 ? How did they get 0 if i dont change them?

Thank you

Last edited by nokian-series; 2010-04-13 at 11:54. Reason: Missing Information

Quote & Reply |

lucas777	2010-04-13 , 12:22
Posts: 738 \| Thanked: 179 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ Gold Coast, Australia	#2615

Question for those running this at 900Mhz is it possible for any of you to install Windows XP now or Windows ME at a decent speed? Even 95 or 98 would there be much diffrence... 300Mhz could make a huge diffrence..

Quote & Reply |

arbitrabbit	2010-04-13 , 12:42
Posts: 171 \| Thanked: 114 times \| Joined on Feb 2010	#2616

Originally Posted by nokian-series

Again..What the meaning of those values? Should i change them to 1 ? How did they get 0 if i dont change them? Thank you

Changing these values to 1 would turn on SmartReflex, a power management feature. For majority of the people, it causes N900 to become unstable but if it works, it increases battery life. To be fair, if you are using the XLV kernel, you would get limited benefit our of it

Quote & Reply |

miwalter	2010-04-13 , 12:43
Posts: 36 \| Thanked: 8 times \| Joined on Apr 2010	#2617

Originally Posted by arbitrabbit

Changing these values to 1 would turn on SmartReflex, a power management feature. For majority of the people, it causes N900 to become unstable but if it works, it increases battery life. To be fair, if you are using the XLV kernel, you would get limited benefit our of it

No.

These values are not the smartreflex ones.

Quote & Reply |

titan	2010-04-13 , 12:51
Posts: 946 \| Thanked: 1,650 times \| Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany	#2618

please let me know whether the upgrade worked fine
or whether you had problems. I'm waiting for your feedback before I promote it to testing.

Originally Posted by titan

some people seem to have problems upgrading to maemo22.
I have no idea why. maybe the modules are not upgraded?

If you used one one of my experimental kernels (not the ones from extras-*)
I recommend the following:
* create a backup!
* reset pmconfig to defaults (125/600)
* reinstall the original kernel and remove kernel-maemo kernel-modules-maemo
apt-get install --reinstall kernel kernel-flasher
apt-get remove kernel-maemo kernel-modules-maemo
then install kernel-flasher-maemo again
apt-get install kernel-modules-maemo
alternatively you could upgrade on the command line and check whether there are any error messages:
apt-get upgrade

in the worst case just reflashing the original kernel over USB should be sufficient
Code:
flasher-3.5 -u -F RX-51_2009SE_3.2010.02-8_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin
sudo flasher-3.5 -f -k zImage -R

Quote & Reply |

	maxximum	2010-04-13 , 13:12
	Posts: 22 \| Thanked: 2 times \| Joined on Nov 2009 @ Norway	#2619

Maemo22 worked like a charm for me.

Had trouble from 19 to 20, did 21 in xterm. 22 from app.manager with no problem. Running the event.d-script and everything working great so far.