The Following User Says Thank You to ishida336 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-28
, 05:29
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#272
|
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-06-28
, 05:34
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#273
|
![]() |
2009-06-28
, 06:26
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#274
|
![]() |
2009-06-28
, 08:43
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#275
|
i'm not going to pay 600$+ for N900 , i guess.
just waste of money and u get nothing only OMPA 3430 which now adays many device have it with less price.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-06-28
, 09:26
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#276
|
![]() |
2009-06-28
, 09:56
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#277
|
![]() |
2009-07-24
, 21:54
|
Posts: 269 |
Thanked: 93 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#278
|
Hi, I will use this thread to send updates on one my committed tasks in the maemo.org June sprint:
9.06-14 Plan for the OMAP2 acceleration drivers
There have been some discussions between the Maemo team and TI in the past months, and we seem to be moving to actions now.
This hasn't moved faster for many reasons, one of them being that this is not the most important item in the priority list shared by both companies. Still, I must say I'm impressed about the willingness to come up with a solution for the community shown by both sides. Really remarkable for a project based on 'legacy hardware' (from the platform development point of view of these companies) with zero revenue and actually some additional costs.
The current idea is that TI or an associated partner will provide either an OSS implementation of the driver known to contain some bugs or a closed implementation with probably better performance (although still not 100% commercial quality) or both. It would a one time delivery with no commitment for additional support.
My take in these discussions has been that an OSS driver is always preferrable since it would give to the community the chances to improve it, as opposed to a closed binary. Ther current idea is to try to implement in the OSS driver the fixes that were implemented in the closed one, tidy up the code a bit and make sure all the licensing is correct.
The scenario of community developers signing NDAs has been discarded. Note that both drivers were developed by two different companies that now they need to share their code. It is much easier to deal with this situation by a developer in one of these companies sharing already an NDA.
Everybody is quite busy but they are trying to arrange the time needed to complete the task. No deadlines and not even a commitment, but the optimist in me thinks that we could have some drivers available during the Summer... or perhaps before the Maemo Summit if unknown problems appear.
![]() |
2009-07-25
, 06:06
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#279
|
![]() |
2009-07-25
, 10:52
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#280
|
The Pandora isn't OMAP3430; it's a 3530, which is (IIRC) similar in feature set, but is not as power-efficient.
Well, it's not like I would be able to afford the next generation, since it's supposed to be a PHONE and likely cost $600+.
Nokia, I don't want a smart phone. I want a mobile linux device. Making another smartphone will just be a "HEY LOOK! We have one too!" in the market of the Iphone and HTC Hero. Instead of sticking to the market they actually have a fairly large stake in, the ultramobile internet tablet, of which there are few pickings now.
It makes me wonder if I should have gotten an Eee.