|
2010-02-15
, 19:16
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 181 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Winchester, UK
|
#272
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jonquark For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-15
, 19:17
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#273
|
Take for example /etc/network/interfaces. This is debian specific and most probably will be different (or don't exist) in Meego.
In other words: Debian goodies (except from packaging) will be gone.
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to gemi For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-15
, 19:24
|
Posts: 376 |
Thanked: 511 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Greece
|
#274
|
I am a Fedora user and contributor. So Debian goodies, as you call them, will be replaced by Fedora goodies.
|
2010-02-15
, 19:25
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Naples, Italy
|
#275
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ne@polis For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-15
, 19:27
|
Posts: 220 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#276
|
It's not that simple. This is not a 'rebranding' - it's a marriage. The maemo community is going to have to connect to the different needs and expectations of the moblin community. That they don't use a forum is just one element.
Moblin seem to be highly developer-oriented, for example, whereas maemo.org is increasingly an enthusiast and user community as well. The Moblin community structure is completely different, too: they don't have an equivalent of the Maemo council. If it were just a rebanding, I doubt there'd be quite so much fuss all round.
|
2010-02-15
, 19:30
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#277
|
That's a valid point. However, all Maemo software currently is built for a Debian system. The transition will require a lot of effort.
I'd like very much to listen to the reasoning behind the transition. For example, it would make sense if there are plans for an official Redhat distribution for mobiles. After all they should be interested in selling support to mobile companies like Nokia, LG, etc.
p.s. I've a question (no intention on starting a flame): Is it possible to upgrade a Redhat system a'la "apt-get dist-upgrade"? IOW, do you think that OS upgrades (SSUs as Nokia calls them) will be possible?
|
2010-02-15
, 19:36
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#278
|
That's a valid point. However, all Maemo software currently is built for a Debian system. The transition will require a lot of effort.
I'd like very much to listen to the reasoning behind the transition. For example, it would make sense if there are plans for an official Redhat distribution for mobiles. After all they should be interested in selling support to mobile companies like Nokia, LG, etc.
p.s. I've a question (no intention on starting a flame): Is it possible to upgrade a Redhat system a'la "apt-get dist-upgrade"? IOW, do you think that OS upgrades (SSUs as Nokia calls them) will be possible?
|
2010-02-15
, 19:38
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#279
|
BTW, YUM works well, but with a large number of packages it becomes quite slow. This is not a problem with today's desktop power, but with the limited performance of mobile devices, it will be an issue.
So again, as a Fedora "fan", I still advocate to stay with the current Debian basis.
|
2010-02-15
, 19:40
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#280
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to fpp For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
let maemo live!, maemo vs. moblin war, rpm vs. deb war |
|
I hope the community could push Mer as an alternative.