The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-04-12
, 15:36
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#2862
|
Not sure if anyone has posted this here yet....
Looks like the WiFi only Galaxy tab is available NOW! for $350
at least Tigerdirect has them...
Good news for those of us wanting an N800 replacement (ie sans cellular modem).
Still leaning towards a rooted/CM7 Nook Color
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bratag For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-04-12
, 15:53
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#2863
|
True, but look at the face recognition portion, he's finding the circumscribing rectangle, which allows for a simple depth calculation. He's not really showing us the original face locking. Following a linearly moving object once you've found it changes calculations by orders of magnitude. And lastly, he's moving that pad slowly; not much acceleration.
In a previous life I was involved with realtime multi-processor/multi-sensor array DSP for tracking bad guys and the things they throw at you.
The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-04-12
, 16:13
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#2864
|
Thanks!
Mine was just speculation. Can you share a link to the source?
The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-04-12
, 16:39
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#2866
|
|
2011-04-12
, 18:04
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2867
|
The guy doesn't supply any code, but he published these videos of n900 head tracking almost a year ago:
http://johanneskuhlmann.de/projects/facedetect#videos
In the first video, he could have made the head moving animation much smoother if he called me.
|
2011-04-12
, 18:53
|
Posts: 1,179 |
Thanked: 770 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#2868
|
The Following User Says Thank You to etuoyo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-04-12
, 20:43
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#2869
|
Just out of curiosity, how would you have changed the original (N900) implementation to make it smoother?
I could take some guesses...
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-04-12
, 21:12
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#2870
|
Along with accelerometer/gyro config values, I would add three more:
Using these values, combined with the deltas of both time and head tracking, you could smooth the movement, and you would also make the code immune to the GPU's speed.
- A time interval: i.e. 1 / Frames Per Second (FPS)
- A min allowable movement per time interval
- A max allowable movement per time interval
Something like that. And maybe you could do a little better by using 2nd order variables like an acceleration delta (not to be confused with the accelerometer delta).
Tags |
android envy, buzz..buzz buzz, core failure, crapdroid, galaxy fap, galaxy tab, ipad killer, samsung, tab trolls, tablet envy |
|
In a previous life I was involved with realtime multi-processor/multi-sensor array DSP for tracking bad guys and the things they throw at you.
N9: Go white or go home