Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2,154 | Thanked: 8,464 times | Joined on May 2010
#2861
Originally Posted by ArnimS View Post
TERRIBLE POWER CONSUMPTION
Ideal profile, Wifi On (adhoc, 10mw send strength, max savings), display off, no sim card

Nokia-N900:~/bin# ./bq27200.sh -h
LOOPMODE=5
mv RSOC CSOC mA NAC CACD CACT TTF TTE TEMP EDV1 LOW
04:45 3740 64 64 -217 1326 1326 1326 65535 367 37 0
04:45 3740 64 64 -227 1326 1326 1326 65535 350 37 0
04:45 3740 64 64 -219 1326 1326 1326 65535 363 37 0

This is crazy! I should be seeing < 10 mA. Are the power49 wifi drivers munged?

Testing without wifi gives a fairly bumpy power consumption between 17 mA and about 90 mA. Note this is wifi off, screen off, measured with the bq2700.sh script. We appear to have a hungry wifi driver here. At these rates, a wifi-connected idle N900 will discharge in 6 hours, instead of lasting for days.
wl1251 driver was not touched. in wifi stack was only disabled buggy mesh network.

Can you attach syslog & dmesg?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pali For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,680 | Thanked: 3,685 times | Joined on Jan 2011
#2862
Originally Posted by ArnimS View Post
TERRIBLE POWER CONSUMPTION
Ideal profile, Wifi On (adhoc, 10mw send strength, max savings), display off, no sim card

Nokia-N900:~/bin# ./bq27200.sh -h
LOOPMODE=5
mv RSOC CSOC mA NAC CACD CACT TTF TTE TEMP EDV1 LOW
04:45 3740 64 64 -217 1326 1326 1326 65535 367 37 0
04:45 3740 64 64 -227 1326 1326 1326 65535 350 37 0
04:45 3740 64 64 -219 1326 1326 1326 65535 363 37 0

This is crazy! I should be seeing < 10 mA. Are the power49 wifi drivers munged?

Testing without wifi gives a fairly bumpy power consumption between 17 mA and about 90 mA. Note this is wifi off, screen off, measured with the bq2700.sh script. We appear to have a hungry wifi driver here. At these rates, a wifi-connected idle N900 will discharge in 6 hours, instead of lasting for days.
If you are running the wifi in adhoc mode, what did you expect?
__________________
N900: One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post:
Posts: 223 | Thanked: 79 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Lebanon- Beirut
#2863
adhoc mode used to bleed my battery in 3 hours with medium use.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ahmadamaj For This Useful Post:
Posts: 35 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Sep 2011
#2864
Originally Posted by vi_ View Post
If you are running the wifi in adhoc mode, what did you expect?
Sure thing. Even the latest mac80211 wifi kernel module does not implement ad-hoc powersave mode.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to whisk4s For This Useful Post:
ArnimS's Avatar
Posts: 1,107 | Thanked: 720 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Germany
#2865
Originally Posted by pali View Post
wl1251 driver was not touched. in wifi stack was only disabled buggy mesh network.

Can you attach syslog & dmesg?
Found it!

Connecting to regular wlan: 22-25mA idle (no pin, screen off)
Connecting to ad-hoc wifi: 200mA idle (no pin, screen off)

[edit: searching for threads on wifi powersaving in ad-hoc mode now]

So ... 22-25 is no where near the best i've seen on an idle device with wlan, but it aint bad! That's somewhere around 160mAh over 8 hours, or maybe 15% battery tops. Sorry for the scare!

(Edit with wifi off i see 17-18 mA, which is higher than the best value i got on stock kernel which was 5 mA)

Thanks!
__________________
find . -name \*.mp3 -exec mplayer -quiet -shuffle "{}" +
das ist your media player, and yuu vill like it
 
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 22 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#2866
Originally Posted by pali View Post
mplayer does not use system gstreamer libraries, but ffmpeg libraries which has another implementation of audio/video codecs & decoding.
Ok guys, thanks to all of you for your feedback. Before talking again about it, i did some tests in the last days. This is what I have found.

mplayer output is smooth when loading a ULV profile with kernel-congif


mplayer output is smooth when loading a LV profile with kernel-congif


mplayer output stutters when I load a DSP profile with kernel-config

mplayer output stutters without using power-config to load any profile, it's enough enabling smartreflex editing the pmconfig file


As you know, I'm not an expert. I did 4 times the tests, every time reflashing the device, with installed only PK49 and the latest testing CSSU. I tried once without CSSU too, things gone in the same way, mplayer output stutters when there is smartreflex enabled.


Can you guys try it too? If u have mplayer+kmplayer installed, it should take only few seconds of your time to load a dsp profile and start a video with mplayer





d!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to thedarkus For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#2867
@Pali - isn't it time KP50 to enter extras-devel?
 
Posts: 104 | Thanked: 43 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ St. Paul, MN
#2868
@ Darkus

Kp49 with CSSU, smartreflex and DSP enabled via pmconfig. No stuttering playing a vid through KMplayer for me.

Others can correct me if I'm wrong as I'm no expert either but the way I understand it, each phone is going to respond slightly differently to the kernel, so what may work best for mine, won't work best for yours.

I use my phone as an mp3 player via mediaplayer for a few hours on the road each day and notice that my battery life is better in that scenario w/o KP49 booted up. My view is if one stutters and the other doesn't, stick with the one that works :-)
 
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#2869
Originally Posted by thedarkus View Post
Ok guys, thanks to all of you for your feedback. Before talking again about it, i did some tests in the last days. This is what I have found.

mplayer output is smooth when loading a ULV profile with kernel-congif


mplayer output is smooth when loading a LV profile with kernel-congif


mplayer output stutters when I load a DSP profile with kernel-config

mplayer output stutters without using power-config to load any profile, it's enough enabling smartreflex editing the pmconfig file


As you know, I'm not an expert. I did 4 times the tests, every time reflashing the device, with installed only PK49 and the latest testing CSSU. I tried once without CSSU too, things gone in the same way, mplayer output stutters when there is smartreflex enabled.


Can you guys try it too? If u have mplayer+kmplayer installed, it should take only few seconds of your time to load a dsp profile and start a video with mplayer





d!
You can try pre-50 build, it has much better SR driver, should solve your issues.
 
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 22 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#2870
Originally Posted by Sphinx780 View Post
@ Darkus

Kp49 with CSSU, smartreflex and DSP enabled via pmconfig. No stuttering playing a vid through KMplayer for me.

Others can correct me if I'm wrong as I'm no expert either but the way I understand it, each phone is going to respond slightly differently to the kernel, so what may work best for mine, won't work best for yours.

I use my phone as an mp3 player via mediaplayer for a few hours on the road each day and notice that my battery life is better in that scenario w/o KP49 booted up. My view is if one stutters and the other doesn't, stick with the one that works :-)
Hey Sphinx, thank you for your feedback and for the time you spent helping me
I only have to ask you if you are sure that kmplayer was using mplayer for decoding the video. I ask you this because with smartreflex enabled gstreamer works great.



d!
 
Reply

Tags
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41.