|
2011-01-10
, 18:31
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#22
|
|
2011-01-10
, 18:42
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#23
|
|
2011-01-10
, 18:58
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#24
|
|
2011-01-10
, 19:06
|
|
Posts: 1,062 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Boston, MA
|
#25
|
|
2011-01-10
, 20:21
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#26
|
Unless/until we get the same os running on both hardware types, and can therefor try the same workloads, it will be hard to tell if the cortex series will match, have matched or perhaps even surpassed atom.
|
2011-01-10
, 20:28
|
Posts: 127 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#27
|
|
2011-01-11
, 12:12
|
|
Posts: 435 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#28
|
|
2011-01-11
, 12:30
|
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 86 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ UK/Scotland
|
#29
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ykho For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-01-11
, 12:37
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#30
|
Tags |
android, atrix, lame idea, lockdown, motorola, nocyanogen, nokia sucks, nokiasucksballs |
|
I think something akin to ATOM performance would qualify for most users. I own a netbook, and it can quite comfortably handle most tasks, though the heavy ones are somewhat painful, though still usable.
In any case, next generation ARM should meet ATOM in performance and certainly work as a netbook replacement for even traditional OSs. Interestingly enough, linux distros seem to be the only ones positioned to take advantage of this.