Lullen
|
2010-01-29
, 23:04
|
Posts: 289 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#21
|
|
2010-01-29
, 23:43
|
Posts: 89 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#22
|
|
2010-01-29
, 23:54
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#23
|
|
2010-01-30
, 00:04
|
|
Posts: 455 |
Thanked: 782 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Netherlands
|
#24
|
Plastic isn't always fantastic when it comes to screens, except if you plan to go rough on it, apple doesn't sell features, they sell design and a tightly controlled enviroment inside it that even monkeys understand how to use.
The Following User Says Thank You to zwer For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-30
, 00:11
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#25
|
I think there's an inversely proportional relationship between the 'magic' and the perceived 'power' that conventional linux users crave.
The 'magic' that Apple has repeatedly demonstrated has to do with making computing simpler and reimplementing real world objects\workflows\analogs into their interface design (to make things more intuitive) - both of which are generally shunned by power users.
|
2010-01-30
, 00:22
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#26
|
When thinking like that linux will never get mainstream. Look at windows and mac os, both are trying to do a more glorious gui with every version they release. Why you can guess? Compare to a car, do you want a car that is appealing to look at or do you want a rusty old one(that is working like linux compared to win/mac)?
|
2010-01-30
, 05:52
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#27
|
Originally Posted by ysssThe true engineering achievement will be in reconciling the "magic" and the "power". The common assumption is that both are not compatible, which is plain out wrong.I think there's an inversely proportional relationship between the 'magic' and the perceived 'power' that conventional linux users crave.
The 'magic' that Apple has repeatedly demonstrated has to do with making computing simpler and reimplementing real world objects\workflows\analogs into their interface design (to make things more intuitive) - both of which are generally shunned by power users.
|
2010-01-30
, 06:29
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#28
|
|
2010-01-30
, 07:00
|
|
Posts: 741 |
Thanked: 900 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Auckland NZ
|
#29
|
The Following User Says Thank You to maluka For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-30
, 09:59
|
Posts: 89 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#30
|
One point of interest is that often developers dismiss UI's, just because they are "pretty", when in fact a UI does more than that.
A true, well designed UI, is helpful to the user, making its use of the software easier, more productive; and even pleasant, depending on how the eye-candy is managed.
Take a look a this, for example:
http://patifa.wordpress.com/2009/11/...g-the-weather/