|
2017-08-24
, 19:19
|
Posts: 1,335 |
Thanked: 3,931 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Brittany, France
|
#22
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kabouik For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-08-24
, 19:29
|
|
Posts: 1,348 |
Thanked: 1,863 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ fr/35/rennes
|
#23
|
Yes, and the main difficulty will be the OS. See the time spent by Jolla developing Sailfish.
|
2017-08-24
, 19:37
|
Posts: 81 |
Thanked: 342 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Finland
|
#24
|
Yes, and the main difficulty will be the OS. See the time spent by Jolla developing Sailfish.
|
2017-08-24
, 19:58
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#25
|
Sailfish has come far, but not nearly enough. They are still 100% dependent on Android kernel and device drivers.
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-08-24
, 20:06
|
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 92 times |
Joined on Aug 2014
@ England, UK
|
#26
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Paspie For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-08-24
, 20:15
|
Posts: 81 |
Thanked: 342 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Finland
|
#27
|
untrue.
SFOS has no dependencies to Android and can run well on any HW that you can get Mer running on. Think about it a while; there are SFOS implementations running on non-android devices, for example RaspberryPI and N9(50)
Also the original Jolla sbj1 was first planned to run on NovaThor SoC requiring no android-funny-business and only had to be changed when STE pulled the plug on the chipset...
The reason most SFOS ports rely on libhybris is because that's all that is available for most phone hardware.
If some vendor made a non-android device platform it'd be no-brainer to port SFOS for it. Without a trace of android.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jukk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-08-25
, 00:29
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 1,142 times |
Joined on Dec 2014
@ Earth
|
#28
|
Are they going to use Android drivers via libhybris or native drivers? Both options have their pros & cons.
|
2017-08-25
, 05:59
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#29
|
I agree, mostly what I meant too. Device drivers is the big problem. But the fact is that 100% of Jolla devices so far run Android kernel and libhybris. Even the tablet that is Intel x86 hardware (I have a Jolla tablet, too)!
For sure GUI applications need some tweaking for phone use and touch interface. Sailfish is also partly closed source at GUI level.
|
2017-08-25
, 07:10
|
Posts: 592 |
Thanked: 1,167 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#30
|
SailfishOS isn't free enough for them, so I doubt they will choose that.
Plasma Mobile is close enough to a Sailfish stack anyway but with a free UI, so perhaps that's what they will package into their own distro.
The Following User Says Thank You to tortoisedoc For This Useful Post: | ||