The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-16
, 04:38
|
|
Posts: 1,148 |
Thanked: 613 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Toronto
|
#22
|
I don't know how you're using отдел агитации и пропаганды (agitprop) or to whom you're applying it to.
The posts between yours and my last one are not clear on this as well. Hitting the "Quote & Reply" button before a post helps sometimes.
If you are using the term in the classic way then I presume you are referring to my previous post as being along the "Nokia Party Line". If so... far from it.
If there is anything I am a fanboi of it is this forum its own dang self. Although it is supported by Nokia, it has remained independent of their influence.
On this forum is where I first became aware of what the N900 is and ain't. I then purchased it after first determining that it would suite my needs. I now contribute information on how it does just that.
Unfortunately many may have bought the thing first, and then have come to this forum to complain about how it doesn't suite their needs.
That doesn't hurt my feelings none as the purchase price is good motivation to learn. Many will learn and contribute and that's a good thing.
However, those who can't or wont learn make a lot of noise before they either pass out or move on. To tolerate this noise you have to filter out or squawk the BS.
In doing so you may also get an indication as to why some have a problem with the device.
The forum system works if you pay attention. For instance:
My thoughts on the above^ exchange are first:Code:POST: "I'm going to piss into the wind" REPLY: "Make sure the wind is at your back"
WTF?
And then:
This is a very good illustration of how some people have trouble understanding even simple things that can be explained precisely with only one dang sentence.
|
2010-05-16
, 05:04
|
Posts: 344 |
Thanked: 73 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#23
|
I don't know how you're using отдел агитации и пропаганды (agitprop) or to whom you're applying it to.
|
2010-05-16
, 07:28
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#24
|
Agitprop ultimately means agitation propoganda, and I'm applying it to you!
Despite its dramatic/communist associations, any propoganda that attempts to sway opinion by means of creating dissention and rift in a way that gives the appearance of being merely unintentional, is agitprop. Hence, I'm using it here in the more modern and common sense of the term, and not the oft-seen "first dictionary definition" sense.
Actually, it dismays me that the word doesn't get more usage, seeing as how much agitprop we are all bombarded with in our time (I'm a North American, so I speak primarily from a US perspective, but I presume all people are subject to it in this day and age of media saturation).
Here's a link or two to get you more formally acquainted with this fine word, one which you otherwise are already familiar with, so it seems!
http://www.websters-online-dictionar.../agitprop.html
(check the "specialty definition" - there's nothing really "special" about it in this day and age, though, but then again, that's probably just the way The Man likes it!)
http://www.wordnik.com/words/agitprop/examples
(Some - admittedly lame - examples)
And as a special bonus, I'll also associate your original post with the term stealth marketing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_marketing
Happy propagandizing, friend!
8^)
[Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Version=1.0 Name=YoGmail Comment=Open Google Mail Mobile Exec=dbus-send --print-reply --dest=com.nokia.osso_browser /com/nokia/osso_browser/request com.nokia.osso_browser.open_new_window string:http://mail.google.com/mail/x Icon=yogmail Terminal=false Type=Application Categories=System;TerminalEmulator; X-HildonDesk-ShowInToolbar=true #X-Osso-Service=xterm X-Osso-Type=application/x-executable
The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-05-16
, 14:30
|
Posts: 344 |
Thanked: 73 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#25
|
Could you please link to or at least quote my post where you believe I am doing whatever it is you think I'm doing and please post why you think so.
All, my new device is an HTC Desire running on Android 2.1 / HTC Sense and I won't switch back to the N900.
<snip>
Where are you going to?
No where. Why do I have to be going somewhere?
Why do you have to ask a loaded question?
|
2010-05-16
, 16:10
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#26
|
|
2010-05-16
, 17:00
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#27
|
|
2010-05-16
, 17:42
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#28
|
could you please link to or at least quote my post where you believe I am doing whatever it is you think I'm doing and please post why you think so.
could you please link to or at least quote my post where you believe I am doing whatever it is you think I'm doing and please post why you think so.
|
2010-05-16
, 18:43
|
Posts: 344 |
Thanked: 73 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#29
|
So, you're [sic ] entire response seems to be directed to the wrong person.
I think you're confusing names .
|
2010-05-17
, 01:13
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#30
|
Oh my, you are correct, sir or madam. How embarrasing. I guess it's due to the fact that YoDude was so adamantly confrontational and defensive in regard to my "agitprop" remark, that I simply assumed he was the OP, and then unconsciously ignored even the very names I was using as quotes in my own posts! How remarkable a thing the human mind is, wouldn't you agree?
So the only question left to ask is, Why was YoDude so adamantly defensive regarding my "agitprop" remark? His was response #15, and mine was response #19. I would have assumed that by not quoting the OP, it was understood that I was replying to the thread's main intent, and not responding to anyone's response in particular.
It is indeed odd that YoDude chose my comment to focus on as a potential reply to his own response - I can se no clear reason for that.
Oh well, I admit being confused, but only by someone who is themself confused. I promise I will try and do better next time. And thank you, fatalsaint, for calling my attention to my error.
...so Uwe, all that bit about agitprop and stealth marketing and loaded language, that was for your benefit. Enjoy, then, I hope you read up on it!
Tags |
whining, worst thread |
|
The posts between yours and my last one are not clear on this as well. Hitting the "Quote & Reply" button before a post helps sometimes.
If you are using the term in the classic way then I presume you are referring to my previous post as being along the "Nokia Party Line". If so... far from it.
If there is anything I am a fanboi of it is this forum its own dang self. Although it is supported by Nokia, it has remained independent of their influence.
On this forum is where I first became aware of what the N900 is and ain't. I then purchased it after first determining that it would suite my needs. I now contribute information on how it does just that.
Unfortunately many may have bought the thing first, and then have come to this forum to complain about how it doesn't suite their needs.
That doesn't hurt my feelings none as the purchase price is good motivation to learn. Many will learn and contribute and that's a good thing.
However, those who can't or wont learn make a lot of noise before they either pass out or move on. To tolerate this noise you have to filter out or squawk the BS.
In doing so you may also get an indication as to why some have a problem with the device.
The forum system works if you pay attention. For instance:
WTF?
And then:
This is a very good illustration of how some people have trouble understanding even simple things that can be explained precisely with only one dang sentence.
SLN member # 009