Active Topics
-
Firefox with Leste (10)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 4 days, 5 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Konceptz For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-03-23
, 03:35
|
|
Posts: 1,562 |
Thanked: 349 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#22
|
Thanks for the tip. I don't need one yet, but now that I know they're in the wild, I can watch for them for future needs.
__________________
Popular Sci-Fi author and creator of the Earthfleet Series.
www.realmsofimagination.net
Popular Sci-Fi author and creator of the Earthfleet Series.
www.realmsofimagination.net
 |
|
2010-03-23
, 04:11
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#23
|
Originally Posted by SAABoy
As I posted earlier in the year, the N900 seems to work fine with the 32GB though I didn't fill it up.
Ok guys, heres my noob question.
The N900 is advertised as having expandable memory UP TO 16gb. Is that just a suggestion? Is there not any reason it can't handle 32gb? Did Nokia advertise 16gb as that was the largest memory available?
|
|
2010-03-23
, 07:00
|
|
Posts: 446 |
Thanked: 79 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#24
|
Originally Posted by pagesix1536
i agree. give it a few weeks it will be down to a reasonable price again. i refuse to pay that much.
Sandisk released their 32GB card today... $200 US though. That's kinda pricey considering their 16GB card can be found for $50 US.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/...anos/?news=123
|
|
2010-03-23
, 07:08
|
|
Posts: 166 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#25
|
Originally Posted by ysss
Just what I needed as I`m about to head out for work
I'll save you some time....
<insert rants about N900 memory limitations>
<apologetic remarks on N900's limitations and how they came about>
<ultimatum to sell his N900 if it doesn't support 32GB microSD>
<snippy quip about iPhone's non expandable memory>
<long piece about iPhone's business model>
<reminder to get back to topic>
<personal attack>
|
|
2010-03-23
, 07:16
|
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 268 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#26
|
Originally Posted by jflatt
Where did you get that information? Class 2 is too slow for a 16 GB card, not to mention 32 GB. It will slow things down. Sigh, my 16 GB is class 4, i will not buy a slower card. At 200 $, you would think it is at least class 6.
Also, the 32GB sandisk is class 2
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tsippaduida For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-03-23
, 07:34
|
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#27
|
The problem is density - with current fab processes (and I suspect for a while still yet) to get 32GB into a uSD you need to use MLC flash - which is slower (and less reliable) than SLC (which takes much more space). Thats why you dont get 6 speed 16GB cards either.
| The Following User Says Thank You to phedders For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-03-23
, 07:40
|
|
Posts: 446 |
Thanked: 79 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#28
|
Originally Posted by Tsippaduida
ty for the SD education. I am a sucker who just brought a class 2 16 GB micro sdhc card on ebay. I know better now for next time
Where did you get that information? Class 2 is too slow for a 16 GB card, not to mention 32 GB. It will slow things down. Sigh, my 16 GB is class 4, i will not buy a slower card. At 200 $, you would think it is at least class 6.
|
|
2010-03-23
, 07:51
|
|
Posts: 1,258 |
Thanked: 672 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#29
|
Originally Posted by Konceptz
It doesn't have much impact on read-speeds.
As far as I've learned, fragmentation should have no real bearing on speed of flash memory.
Wear should only matter if the memory is at the end of it's read/write lifespan.
On write speeds it's worse than harddrives. If you write 4k to sd card, the sd card must internally read 256, change 4k of it, and write it back. Take 256/4 and you get the slowdown factor. Obviously, writing 256k for a 4k request means the flash is taking much more wear.
|
|
2010-03-23
, 07:56
|
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 268 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#30
|
Originally Posted by phedders
Hmm... Seems to me some manufacturers use speedier technology (class 6 & class 10). Check these out:
The problem is density - with current fab processes (and I suspect for a while still yet) to get 32GB into a uSD you need to use MLC flash - which is slower (and less reliable) than SLC (which takes much more space). Thats why you dont get 6 speed 16GB cards either.
http://www.transcend.nl/Products/Mod...pNo=1&LangNo=0
http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/conf...16GB-2ADP&id=1
Last edited by Tsippaduida; 2010-03-23 at 07:57. Reason: Fixed typing
 |
| Tags |
| 32 gb, 32gb, accessory, card, flash card, flash storage, microsd, microsd card, microsdhc, microsdhc card, n800, n810, n900, removable storage, secure digital |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:50.
As far as I've learned, fragmentation should have no real bearing on speed of flash memory.
Wear should only matter if the memory is at the end of it's read/write lifespan.