The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to number41 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-12
, 07:33
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#22
|
|
2011-08-20
, 13:12
|
Banned |
Posts: 726 |
Thanked: 497 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Gravesend, UK
|
#24
|
Actually, Fennec isn't really all that sluggish, at least when you look at the older nightlys... http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...key-maemo5-qt/ Has a good example of a browser that's actually on par if not faster than microB.
Could you guys take a look at it? It not too sure what the mozilla team did wrong, but they did mess up somewhere along the line... If you compare this one with the newer builds, it's smoking fast... Not sure where to get the source, though.
I did once try to get volunteers to test other fennec builds... Not much help, there. There's this guy over at the mozilla team, mbrubeck, who seemed happy, willing and motivated to collaborate with others to solve fennec's issues, should anyone want to help in that.
|
2011-08-20
, 14:03
|
Posts: 237 |
Thanked: 274 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#25
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ivyking For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-20
, 18:32
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Accra,Ghana
|
#26
|
Actually, Fennec isn't really all that sluggish, at least when you look at the older nightlys... http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...key-maemo5-qt/ Has a good example of a browser that's actually on par if not faster than microB.
Could you guys take a look at it? It not too sure what the mozilla team did wrong, but they did mess up somewhere along the line... If you compare this one with the newer builds, it's smoking fast... Not sure where to get the source, though.
I did once try to get volunteers to test other fennec builds... Not much help, there. There's this guy over at the mozilla team, mbrubeck, who seemed happy, willing and motivated to collaborate with others to solve fennec's issues, should anyone want to help in that.
|
2011-08-20
, 19:10
|
Posts: 313 |
Thanked: 247 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ USA
|
#27
|
well I've always thought that the qt builds were much smoother than the gtk builds but looks like they have stopped development for qt
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to dsawhney For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-20
, 19:56
|
Posts: 135 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
#28
|
Not true, they're still developing qt builds, just changed the download directory, you can get them from here:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/tin...ral-maemo5-qt/
latest qt nightly, 9.0-a1 is a lot faster than older versions, page load/scrolling performance is almost on par with microb/opera now
|
2011-08-20
, 20:30
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Accra,Ghana
|
#30
|
Not true, they're still developing qt builds, just changed the download directory, you can get them from here:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/tin...ral-maemo5-qt/
latest qt nightly, 9.0-a1 is a lot faster than older versions, page load/scrolling performance is almost on par with microb/opera now
Could you guys take a look at it? It not too sure what the mozilla team did wrong, but they did mess up somewhere along the line... If you compare this one with the newer builds, it's smoking fast... Not sure where to get the source, though.
I did once try to get volunteers to test other fennec builds... Not much help, there. There's this guy over at the mozilla team, mbrubeck, who seemed happy, willing and motivated to collaborate with others to solve fennec's issues, should anyone want to help in that.