kyllerbuzcut
|
2011-12-10
, 08:50
|
Posts: 345 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ uk
|
#21
|
|
2011-12-10
, 09:36
|
Posts: 1,523 |
Thanked: 1,997 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ not your mom's FOSS basement
|
#22
|
WebOS is already highly optimized for phones. As an example, the way multitasking is done (cards instead of windows, as it's done in Maemo 5)
The only way I can think of improving WebOS is: overhaul it, making the UI use uxlaunch instead of the crazy, depend-on-several-services-that-are-not-dbus-and-X thing that it has now, and make it use DEB/RPM instead of the inadequate IPKG.
Oh, and a GRID of cards, not a stack of them. Like a hybrid of the N9 and Pre, swiping them away or into view.
Oh, and maybe migrate away from Mojo/Enyo to Tizen HTML5? The two are already quite similar.
|
2011-12-10
, 10:25
|
Posts: 293 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Al Quds, Isawiya
|
#23
|
|
2011-12-10
, 10:33
|
Posts: 1,523 |
Thanked: 1,997 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ not your mom's FOSS basement
|
#24
|
|
2011-12-10
, 12:06
|
Posts: 54 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Milano
|
#25
|
|
2011-12-10
, 12:41
|
Posts: 432 |
Thanked: 544 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#26
|
|
2011-12-10
, 13:20
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#27
|
I don't mind everybody under the sun developing their own GUI framework but it should be possible to expect the availability of some of the most common GUI frameworks, even in the "there you have it, we don't guarantee anything" state.
There is just no hardware reason GTK, Qt or EFL couldn't run on the WebOS devices.
BTW, found something about Qt running on WebOS:
http://www.precentral.net/qt-app-pla...nning-palm-pre
http://blog.qt.nokia.com/2010/02/19/...-of-your-hand/
Unfortunately its rather old and I haven't found any recent developments during my brief search.
|
2011-12-10
, 13:45
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 747 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
|
#28
|
Qt was actually part of webOS (they used it for something internally) but the problem was twofold - that it wass officially off-limits for 3rd party apps, and that it was a fairly old version (4.6.x). Now, if the thing is really open source, it should be fairly trivial to upgrade that version to 4.8 and make it available to all applications (ideally, with a bit more work, through a proper QPA backend).
|
2011-12-10
, 13:54
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#29
|
Yeah, you hit on 2 major points I was wondering about...
1. Is WebOS now ALL open, or is it like Maemo and Android - sorta open, that is, open except for the parts that aren't? I haven't found a straight answer yet.
2. How hard will it be to fully adapt current Qt for ease of further development?
But overall this has to be a good thing. A (relatively speaking) finished, attractive open source real mobile Linux operating system with some built-in name recognition for the general public. A few million people have seen or at least heard of WebOS. How many people on the street would know what Tizen is?
|
2011-12-10
, 13:55
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#30
|
Now, if the thing is really open source, it should be fairly trivial to upgrade that version to 4.8 and make it available to all applications