Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (7)
to Nokia N900 by Danct12 - 2 days, 21 hrs ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 3 days, 17 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 6 days, 1 hr ago - more...
 |
|
2011-06-02
, 14:27
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#22
|
That's not what Nokia expressed to us. The slides said that MeeGo should be the top edge smartphones, while Symbian should still be the main smartphone OS.
|
|
2011-06-02
, 14:30
|
|
Posts: 457 |
Thanked: 600 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#23
|
But that's not the point. What was talked was using MeeGo as a replacement for Symbian across the whole range - and Nokia have a much bigger Symbian line up than 1 device/year.
Touchscreen with the same form factor, same UI, maybe a different camera or an additional hardware keyboard, thats it.
This news is ********.
 |
|
2011-06-02
, 14:32
|
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Brazil
|
#24
|
Originally Posted by volt
Yeah, I don't see a change on how Noka handles MeeGo with that.
That's not what Nokia expressed to us. The slides said that MeeGo should be the top edge smartphones, while Symbian should still be the main smartphone OS.
Symbian lines will be migrated to WP7, Meego will be released 1 per year or 1.5 years, as flagship phones as the N900 was. And this will not mean that weren't be WP7 flagship phones, like N97 and N8.
|
|
2011-06-02
, 14:33
|
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#25
|
Originally Posted by Verythrax
Have you seen the minimum specs for a WP7 phone? No way can Nokia push this to their low low end, also, most, if not all of Nokia's current midrange have terrible ARMv6 processors and a dismal amount of RAM.
From the specs of the WP7 phones, it's very possible that it can easily on more underpowered platforms. Not underpowered as current Nokia's low end hardware, but it seems it can fit mid range easily.
And seems like the WP7 experience doesnt need to be sacrified on worst hardware, as Android needs (launchers, lower resolution, etc)
__________________
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
|
|
2011-06-02
, 14:37
|
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Brazil
|
#26
|
Originally Posted by Rugoz
Yeah, WP7 seems to be a good fit to replace Symbian, engineering wise. I just don't see why and how WP7 could replace MeeGo. Maybe in the future, as newer interactions add more and more functionality to the OS.
So what kind of different wp7 or symbian^3 devices are there on the market? Right, except the E6 they're all the same!!
Touchscreen with the same form factor, same UI, maybe a different camera or an additional hardware keyboard, thats it.
This news is ********.
|
|
2011-06-02
, 14:40
|
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Brazil
|
#27
|
Originally Posted by Hurrian
Despite the CPU, the memory amount, HVGA res and 5mp camera looks very midrange to me. And by the time Nokia targets WP7 to midrange, there will be much better CPUs available, and the price will drop.
Have you seen the minimum specs for a WP7 phone? No way can Nokia push this to their low low end, also, most, if not all of Nokia's current midrange have terrible ARMv6 processors and a dismal amount of RAM.
And keep in mind that actually Nokia sells underspecced hardware compared to their competitors. 512 ram and dual cores are the norm in smartphones bleeding edge now. See the original Galaxy S: it's last year design, single core, and it's already a midtier, with an ARM8.
Last edited by Verythrax; 2011-06-02 at 14:48.
|
|
2011-06-02
, 14:54
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#28
|
It was ment to be like this:
However, with the introduction of MeeGo, the synergy between Nokias platforms increased tremendously. Both MeeGo and Symbian^3 would be Qt based, meaning that the software built for the broad Symbian user base, also would work for the top end devices. Replacing Symbian and ditching the Qt as Nokias main development platform does indeed change everything for MeeGo. Qt and the addition of the Symbian user base were the only advantages many saw here, when Nokia scrapped Maemo for the new MeeGo strategy.
Now, once the new N device is out, Nokia says MeeGo@Nokia will be downsized and moved back to being a R&D project. This is planned to happen with the MeeGo funding:
That's a pretty steep cutback, especially considering how few devices they got out on the original funding.
Also, we have that whole stock warning situation from this week. Ahonen speculates that Elop may use that to cut MeeGo completely.
So, I do see how Nokia handles MeeGo differently now.
However, with the introduction of MeeGo, the synergy between Nokias platforms increased tremendously. Both MeeGo and Symbian^3 would be Qt based, meaning that the software built for the broad Symbian user base, also would work for the top end devices. Replacing Symbian and ditching the Qt as Nokias main development platform does indeed change everything for MeeGo. Qt and the addition of the Symbian user base were the only advantages many saw here, when Nokia scrapped Maemo for the new MeeGo strategy.
Now, once the new N device is out, Nokia says MeeGo@Nokia will be downsized and moved back to being a R&D project. This is planned to happen with the MeeGo funding:
That's a pretty steep cutback, especially considering how few devices they got out on the original funding.
Also, we have that whole stock warning situation from this week. Ahonen speculates that Elop may use that to cut MeeGo completely.
So, I do see how Nokia handles MeeGo differently now.
|
|
2011-06-02
, 15:06
|
|
Posts: 968 |
Thanked: 974 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Ohio
|
#29
|
I'm looking at it like this:
I love my N900, it's great and can do a lot of stuff other phones can't, but only because the community stepped up and filled in the gaps. Take a bare stock N900, and tell me it's ready to go toe-to-toe with either iOS or Android for use by the masses.
Yes, I know it was step 4 of 5, and not really ready for the masses. But even given that, I always felt like the OS had been rushed out 80-90% complete, just to get something out the door. I believe that the N900 was released because they had the hardware, had delayed as long as they felt they could and needed to get something moving before the community left, the hardware was surpassed, etc. Feel free to disagree, this is only my thoughts.
However, I can see the project leaders for MeeGo saying everything will be ready on time, don't worry, it'll be great, back in October. A quarter later, in January, excuses are being made, upon further review, it's determined that while they could release something ala the N900 (not quite finished) and hope the community picks up the slack, or face the music and decide it's just not ready.
That kind of fits the scenario of having a bunch of older hardware to pawn off on developers (initial orders were placed on the assumption the OS would be ready), and why you'd need a second device with newer hardware to compete in the mass market when the OS is finally ready for release.
I love my N900, it's great and can do a lot of stuff other phones can't, but only because the community stepped up and filled in the gaps. Take a bare stock N900, and tell me it's ready to go toe-to-toe with either iOS or Android for use by the masses.
Yes, I know it was step 4 of 5, and not really ready for the masses. But even given that, I always felt like the OS had been rushed out 80-90% complete, just to get something out the door. I believe that the N900 was released because they had the hardware, had delayed as long as they felt they could and needed to get something moving before the community left, the hardware was surpassed, etc. Feel free to disagree, this is only my thoughts.
However, I can see the project leaders for MeeGo saying everything will be ready on time, don't worry, it'll be great, back in October. A quarter later, in January, excuses are being made, upon further review, it's determined that while they could release something ala the N900 (not quite finished) and hope the community picks up the slack, or face the music and decide it's just not ready.
That kind of fits the scenario of having a bunch of older hardware to pawn off on developers (initial orders were placed on the assumption the OS would be ready), and why you'd need a second device with newer hardware to compete in the mass market when the OS is finally ready for release.
__________________
*Consumer*, not a developer! I apologize for any inconvenience.
My script to backup /home and /opt
Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant, Huawei S7, N900(retired), N800(retired)
*Consumer*, not a developer! I apologize for any inconvenience.
My script to backup /home and /opt
Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant, Huawei S7, N900(retired), N800(retired)
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lemmyslender For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
| Tags |
| bada blows, buysomethinelse, good move, goodbye nokia, wp7 rocks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:16.
I would have thought that matching apple in the new world of an ecosystem best centred around one key smart phone.......yes which is different from the old world of low a plethora low end phones which do not support an ecosystem ......that matching that and having nokias own ecosystem should have been the goal?
No....i guess trying to build Microsoft's ecosystem rather than being a competitor makes more sense. Except, Nokia is unlikely to prosper as just another builder of a phone for an ecosystem.