The TIZEN Thread - Page 3 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (3)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 1 hr, 49 mins ago
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 1 day, 5 hrs ago
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 1 day, 18 hrs ago
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 5 days, 17 hrs ago
more...

Page 3 of 52

< Prev

Next >

Last »

Thread Tools

	Kangal	2012-05-14 , 23:54
	Posts: 1,789 \| Thanked: 1,699 times \| Joined on Mar 2010	#21

So not only is Tizen a castrated Linux build, it will have sloppy HTML programs and sluggish Java Programs....I only have this response:

__________________

Originally Posted by mscion

I vote that Kangal replace Elop!

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post

I'm flattered

Quote & Reply |

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post:
Gerii, GrimyHR, mikecomputing, misiak, sunc, Zoxir

zimon	2012-05-15 , 00:46
Posts: 1,341 \| Thanked: 708 times \| Joined on Feb 2010	#22

Originally Posted by Kangal

So not only is Tizen a castrated Linux build, it will have sloppy HTML programs and sluggish Java Programs...

Android phones do not have sluggish Java Programs, so why should Tizen? Bad non optimized VM?

And as it is Linux system, most likely you can install and run Qt/C++ and Qt/Python programs on it also. As they are porting Qt to Android, surely it will be ported (if it even needs porting) to Tizen.

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to zimon For This Useful Post:
immi.shk

gerbick	2012-05-15 , 04:09
Guest \| Posts: n/a \| Thanked: 0 times \| Joined on	#23

Okay. Really didn't expect to see hatred for a Linux Foundation hosted mobile OS that's based off of Linux. Quite surprising actually.

I don't see Tizen as being an option until they do something on the hardware side that catches everybody off-guard. Something on the level of Galaxy S3 or something else highly advanced (name your poison).

I don't see open-sourced WebOS being an option because most of those folks have moved on to other, more profitable platforms. Same for Harmattan.

Regardless... I'm waiting to see what happens with Tizen. My hopes are capped to limit and manage my expectations.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
fw190, WilliePre

	Estel	2012-05-15 , 04:52
	Posts: 5,028 \| Thanked: 8,613 times \| Joined on Mar 2011	#24

Originally Posted by gerbick

Okay. Really didn't expect to see hatred for a Linux Foundation hosted mobile OS that's based off of Linux. Quite surprising actually.

Personally, i do not care what is blessed or not by Linux Foundation. I care for meritocratic value of it.

Only and sole point of interest I may have in any Tizen device, is if Mer manage to put 100% working (hardware components, drivers, etc) Mer on it, and Nemo maturates enough. +, if I'll be able to install it whipping Tizen out of device, thus running Mer/Nemo without any speed disadvantage.

for any other purposes, it's a hoax.

/Estel

__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!

Quote & Reply |

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
fw190, GrimyHR, Kangal, MartinK

zimon	2012-05-15 , 05:14
Posts: 1,341 \| Thanked: 708 times \| Joined on Feb 2010	#25

Old farts need to read this paper:
http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~julian...than%20C++.pdf

...and understand about runtime optimizations concept:
http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/pe...eee-survey.pdf

ON increasing type of family of applications JIT-compiled and interpreted programs are as fast or could be even faster than fully precompiled ones.

Android users do not complain the applications would run slowly, even in low end droids.

Quote & Reply |

immi.shk	2012-05-15 , 05:23
Posts: 432 \| Thanked: 544 times \| Joined on Feb 2011	#26

Originally Posted by Estel

Personally, i do not care what is blessed or not by Linux Foundation. I care for meritocratic value of it.

Only and sole point of interest I may have in any Tizen device, is if Mer manage to put 100% working (hardware components, drivers, etc) Mer on it, and Nemo maturates enough. +, if I'll be able to install it whipping Tizen out of device, thus running Mer/Nemo without any speed disadvantage.

for any other purposes, it's a hoax.

/Estel

but what i feel is..
Tizen is a survivor from a great legacy..

and if SAMSUNG is enthusiastic enough to add an ACL(android compatibility layer) to Platform they just came across

IMHO, we(TMO people) too are passionate enough to atleast try to add a MCL(maemo/meego compatibility layer) to Platform which is directly/indirectly derived from Ours..

__________________
Be the change you want to see in the World - Mahatma Gandhi

[Transform] Easy Debian LXDE to Window Xp, Win7, Win98 Desktop
[Transform] N900 Nitdroid to Cute "iPad Micro-Tablet"
[Transform] N900 Nitdroid to Awesome "HONEYCOMB MICRO-TABLET"
[SOLVED]- N900 Nitdroid WiFi Hotspot(Ad-Hoc WiFi Tether)
[SOLVED]- WiFi[Ad-Hoc] Internet Tethering problem
[INSTALL] Oprea Mobile to PC
LXDE simplified , TMO [Night-Mode]

Last edited by immi.shk; 2012-05-15 at 18:15.

Quote & Reply |

	Stskeeps	2012-05-15 , 05:26
	Posts: 1,671 \| Thanked: 11,478 times \| Joined on Jun 2008 @ Warsaw, Poland	#27

Originally Posted by gerbick

Okay. Really didn't expect to see hatred for a Linux Foundation hosted mobile OS that's based off of Linux. Quite surprising actually.

Off topic:

Sadly, my experience has been that even if a project is based in the Linux Foundation, it has more to deal with pooling resources in a shared manner than anything remotely dealing with open governance or stated open goals of any projects. Where money interests trumps sane technical arguments.

That said, Tizen may have potential for the simple reason that they actually provide a quite fast web runtime that may be useful across many Linux distributions. Giving Linux the common 'app' story it so desperately needs. Despite all the nay-sayers, this web runtime really runs damn fast.

But I don't believe there'll ever be a proper open governance for that. At least it'll be balanced with W3C interactions. But I don't see anybody sane complaining about their Chrome browser on Linux not being open and democratic..

Last edited by Stskeeps; 2012-05-15 at 05:28.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
Aparaatti, diegofigueroa, Estel, fw190, kevloral, MaddogG, MartinK, mikhas, misterc, pelago, sbock, Sourav.dubey

SamGan	2012-05-15 , 05:48
Posts: 648 \| Thanked: 650 times \| Joined on Oct 2011	#28

Will the parents of Tizen allow Android apps to be run and lose the income from a proprietary app store?

Quote & Reply |

Zoxir	2012-05-15 , 06:03
Posts: 273 \| Thanked: 463 times \| Joined on May 2011 @ Athens	#29

Originally Posted by SamGan

Will the parents of Tizen allow Android apps to be run and lose the income from a proprietary app store?

I was actually thinking something else. How will google see this development, meaning if tizen devices come to the market and can use android apps, will they just stand by or will they start kicking? Even though it will probably depend on the success of tizen.