Dell Releases What n900 Should Have Been (Dell Streak) - Page 3 - maemo.org

Active Topics

The N900 is now 15 years old! (7)
to Nokia N900 by Danct12 - 3 days, 7 hrs ago
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 4 days, 2 hrs ago
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 6 days, 11 hrs ago
more...

Page 3 of 36

< Prev

Next >

Last »

Thread Tools

	javispedro	2009-10-21 , 16:16
	Posts: 2,355 \| Thanked: 5,249 times \| Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona	#21

Originally Posted by c0rt3x

Android = Capacitive

What has an operating system to do with a device's touchscreen technology? I doubt Android cares whether its input device is resistive, capacitive, a mouse, banging your head on the wall or just voice commands (as long as it can provide an absolute x,y coordinate and a boolean "click" value).

Originally Posted by flux41

Capacitive screen... Ok that is nice, but is it really the only reason why this device is even being considered?

Being unconsidered.

Quote & Reply |

c0rt3x	2009-10-21 , 16:21
Posts: 367 \| Thanked: 176 times \| Joined on Oct 2009	#22

Originally Posted by javispedro

What has an operating system to do with a device's touchscreen technology? I doubt Android cares whether its input device is resistive, capacitive, a mouse, banging your head on the wall or just voice commands (as long as it can provide an absolute x,y coordinate and a boolean "click" value).

What has an operating system to do with a device's CPU technology? Yet Android 1.5 only allowed one model (not only limited to a specific CPU type, but also to a special model). The Qualcomm MSM 7201A 528 MHz processor.

Quote & Reply |

	javispedro	2009-10-21 , 16:25
	Posts: 2,355 \| Thanked: 5,249 times \| Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona	#23

Originally Posted by c0rt3x

What has an operating system to do with a device's CPU technology?

Everything?

Either way, there have been multiple Android devices with different touch screen technologies and with different processors, so the point is moot.

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post:
danramos

c0rt3x	2009-10-21 , 16:32
Posts: 367 \| Thanked: 176 times \| Joined on Oct 2009	#24

Originally Posted by javispedro

Everything?

Either way, there have been multiple Android 1.5 phones with different touch screen technologies and with different processors, so the point is moot.

[Too short message]

Quote & Reply |

	javispedro	2009-10-21 , 16:38
	Posts: 2,355 \| Thanked: 5,249 times \| Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona	#25

And a N810 running Android 1.0 . And the first devices (BEFORE the G1) to run Android were all resistive .

Quote & Reply |

DaveP1	2009-10-21 , 16:57
Posts: 607 \| Thanked: 450 times \| Joined on Sep 2009 @ Washington, DC	#26

Originally Posted by Texrat

I can't call that "what the N900 should have been". Who wants a phone that big, except maybe on their desk?

Me. If it has a usable on screen keyboard this device could work as a computer and is not too big to pocket. To my mind, the N900, while it has a real keyboard (which I prefer), has a screen that is just too small to work as a computer for long.

There's a bit more information in the SlashGear post:

http://www.slashgear.com/dell-streak...leaks-2161220/

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to DaveP1 For This Useful Post:
swajime

UCOMM	2009-10-21 , 16:58
Posts: 232 \| Thanked: 106 times \| Joined on Sep 2009 @ Chicago/D.C./Katowice	#27

4.1 is pushing it for a phone, 5 is just plain stupid

3.7/8 and i'd be happy

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to UCOMM For This Useful Post:
matthewcc

cheetos316	2009-10-21 , 17:19
Posts: 95 \| Thanked: 7 times \| Joined on Jun 2009	#28

Just because it ships with Android doesn't mean that another OS can't run on it right? Would it be possible to flash it to run something like Maemo?

Quote & Reply |

ioioio	2009-10-21 , 17:31
Posts: 86 \| Thanked: 55 times \| Joined on May 2009	#29

Originally Posted by javispedro

Capacitive screen. Eeek.

If it makes no difference expense wise or battery wise (in a perfect world), you want a capacitive screen, makes a huge difference in terms of usability. You can't accomplish the same things on a resistive screen.