![]() |
2006-12-02
, 13:24
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Aug 2006
|
#22
|
![]() |
2008-01-09
, 14:26
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#23
|
![]() |
2008-01-09
, 14:54
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Idaho Falls, ID
|
#24
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tlacuache For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-01-16
, 18:17
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#25
|
If using mplayer, it is better to have video encoded to some fixed set of resolutions, see details on maemo mplayer homepage: http://mplayer.garage.maemo.org/
Lower resolution does not mean better performance for mplayer currently (it is different from built-in player), you will just lose some quality. For 16:9 video it is better to use 400x224 resolution, mplayer will use fast and high quality hardware scaling in this case. If you try anything different from optimal resolution (width equal to 400 or height equal to 240), mplayer will have to fallback to lower quality and slower software scaling.
Probably the best video codec for mplayer is mpeg4 and audio codec - mp3.
By the way, mplayer also has gui on nokia 770 and you can type url for streaming in the top editbox (it still can't be saved to form playlist for future reuse though). GUI is still very simplistic, but its future development heavily depends on users feedback. As we did not see many feature requests in mplayer thread lately, does it mean that everyone is satisfied with its current state?
Last edited by Serge; 2006-12-01 at 22:38.