|
2007-11-25
, 16:21
|
Posts: 529 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#22
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Darius2006 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2007-11-26
, 00:07
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#23
|
|
2007-11-26
, 04:12
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#24
|
|
2007-11-26
, 04:55
|
Posts: 550 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
|
#25
|
|
2007-11-26
, 14:04
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#26
|
|
2007-11-26
, 18:25
|
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Ontario, Canada
|
#27
|
|
2007-11-26
, 19:04
|
|
Posts: 229 |
Thanked: 108 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Sacramento, California
|
#28
|
|
2007-11-26
, 19:06
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#29
|
|
2007-11-26
, 20:26
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#30
|
My problem with MaemoMapper is that it is using graphical images of maps rather than vector data. This is about 10 times larger (or more) in file size. Since I drive most of California I would need about 10 gigabytes just to hold SOME of the levels of detail that I would truely want to have.
That is where NaviCore or whatever it is called would probably shine. But, in the videos of this program, it's too dang slow to find any POI's. My older Pocket PC/GPS combo with Mapopolis (now out of the consumer level business) gave me tons of configurable options for road detail, zooming, POI's for a great price. It seems using the Nokia N810 and its mapping solution is a downgrade.
Sevo