![]() |
2007-12-02
, 21:24
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#22
|
![]() |
2007-12-03
, 11:57
|
|
Posts: 1,107 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Germany
|
#23
|
![]() |
2007-12-03
, 12:34
|
Posts: 108 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Central London
|
#24
|
This would be AMAZING. I'm very eager to find out what can be done with the N810. Keep us posted!
I wish I had information to contribute, but alas, I'm N810-less...
}:^)~
YARR!
Capt'n Corrupt
![]() |
2007-12-03
, 13:37
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#25
|
Beat frequencies are generated by two overlaid waves at different frequencies. If for e.g. you play back a 400hz wave and a 406hz wave, your ear will hear a wave at 6 hz.
For the ear to hear a beat frequency does not require a playback mechanism capable of reproducing a carrier at that frequency. Specifically, to hear a 6hz (cycles per second) frequency using ~400hz carrier waves, any speaker or headphone will suffice. Here, i show yuu.
http://pupnik.de/beat_frequency_6hz_at_400hz.mp3
![]() |
2007-12-03
, 13:47
|
|
Posts: 3,524 |
Thanked: 2,958 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Delta Quadrant
|
#26
|
Sure - just someone who knows what they're doing let me know what to do, e.g. "buy this cable from here (or better buy one for me), run this command/post this log file output" etc and I'll be happy to oblige
Incidentally - the low-end in-ear earphones by Sennheiser (about £30-40 high street price, the ones with the black rubber domes) are a great match for the N810.
![]() |
2007-12-03
, 13:56
|
|
Posts: 1,310 |
Thanked: 820 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Irving, TX
|
#27
|
![]() |
2007-12-04
, 00:11
|
|
Posts: 1,310 |
Thanked: 820 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Irving, TX
|
#28
|
I just ordered myself Shure e2c in-ear headphones. Those go now around $60-70 in the US... and should be relatively decent in sound quality. (And do block background noise quite effectively.)
I'll post back about my experience once I receive them.
![]() |
2007-12-05
, 00:00
|
|
Posts: 880 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#29
|
![]() |
2007-12-05
, 01:11
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#30
|
Measuring frequency response is not something you can really do well at home, even with high-end recording equipment.
I wish I had information to contribute, but alas, I'm N810-less...
}:^)~
YARR!
Capt'n Corrupt
Last edited by Capt'n Corrupt; 2007-12-02 at 20:46.