Reply
Thread Tools
fpp's Avatar
Posts: 2,853 | Thanked: 968 times | Joined on Nov 2005
#21
This reminds me... at about the time Windows 3.0 came out, there was also a GUI called Geo-something-or-other, that was smaller, faster, and actually did some things better than Windows (like proportional font printing and graphics). It got smashed by the market of course, although it survived for a while in embedded devices. I guess it could be made to run in DOSBOX if only someone has kept in in a drawer :-)
 
Posts: 223 | Thanked: 31 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#22
GeoWorks. Don't ask me how much money I lost investing in that company in the dot com era (hint: it is the only reason I still toil in a 9-5 job today).
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#23
would that be geoworks?
http://www.digibarn.com/collections/...v1-2/index.htm

edit: heh, to slow...

Last edited by tso; 2008-08-03 at 15:51.
 
Posts: 4,030 | Thanked: 1,633 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ nd usa
#24
Originally Posted by piku View Post
Inspired by this post, and being slightly bored on a warm, quiet Sunday I present to you...

The GEM Desktop in DOSBOX. I wrote about it on my website if anyone's interested in how I made it work

http://www.piku.org.uk/drupal/conten...t-using-dosbox

And it's not fake either :P
Bravo! That is fascinating! How fast does it run?

bun
 
Posts: 69 | Thanked: 24 times | Joined on Feb 2007
#25
Originally Posted by bunanson View Post
Bravo! That is fascinating! How fast does it run?

bun
It's not bad. A bit slow, but kind of usable, it'll crash if anything tries to open a display that won't fit on the N810's screen though.
 
fpp's Avatar
Posts: 2,853 | Thanked: 968 times | Joined on Nov 2005
#26
Yes, that was GeoWorks, it came back to me later (as usual).

A fine product actually, but the worse timing you could think of...

Anyone have that DOS version ?
 
Posts: 80 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Seattle
#27
http://www.breadbox.com/dldetails.as...&maincategory=
thats a howto from breadbox (the current father of GWOS) on running it though DOSBOX in windows, but it asks for 1GHZ proseccsor =/

interesting though, they seem to be running breadbox (atleast their apps...) on the Nokia 9000/9110, 9210/9290 and the 9500/9300


starting point atelast
 
fpp's Avatar
Posts: 2,853 | Thanked: 968 times | Joined on Nov 2005
#28
Actually I think you have it backwards : the Howto explains how running GW in DOSBOX solves the problem that CPUs above 1Ghz are *too fast* for Geoworks !

So we should be fine at 400 Mhz on our tablets :-)
 
Posts: 80 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Seattle
#29
http://www.vetusware.com/download/En...202.0/?id=3907

GeoWorks Ensemble v 2.0
Im having a hard time finding any spec sheet for this relase though
so I have no idea what the sys requirements are, but I did find this review from 1993
PC/GEOS is the multitasking operating system core of the GeoWorks Ensemble 2.0 software package for the IBM PC. It runs comfortably on a 386SX-16 with 2 MB of memory. The installation takes only 9 MB of disk space. My GeoWorks directory is 25 MB because of the enormous amount of data files I have collected. (Dozens of fonts, thousands of icons, dozens of pages of clip-art, etc..)
the article is really funny, in a "oh, rember back when..." sort of way

for example...

Do you need to use your computer for more than one thing at once? I do, and apparently there are millions more like me, as demonstrated by the sales of DesqView, OS/2, Windows, etc...

What do most graphical multitasking Operating Systems have in common? High system requirements and slow performance. OS/2 (v2.1) for example needs 8 MB of memory and 35 MB of disk space just to run a few small or medium size applications. For major applications to run well, you need even more memory and disk space.


full article..
http://www.markshapiro.com/Issue8.p12-p30.html
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#30
heh, that statement about what graphical environments have in common is on level with this from old-computers.com, about the choice of cpu for the ibm pc:

After hesitation between the Intel 8086 (16 bit) and the Motorola MC68000, they decided to use the Intel 8088 (8 - 16 bit) processor, as the two other ones were considered too powerful!
can someone say innovators dilemma?

http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=274
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57.