![]() |
2009-01-27
, 22:44
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#22
|
![]() |
2009-01-27
, 22:50
|
|
Posts: 1,390 |
Thanked: 642 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ California USA
|
#23
|
all of my stations have already switched to digital and it is great ota and cable company also sends the locals down every wire unencrypted too.
i live in the test market and we made the switch in october. i think america is ready,
![]() |
2009-01-28
, 00:12
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#24
|
Quipper8 - What have people in your area been using as a VCR replacement for OTA timed recording of favorite shows?
![]() |
2009-01-28
, 00:28
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#25
|
Quipper8 - What have people in your area been using as a VCR replacement for OTA timed recording of favorite shows?
![]() |
2009-01-28
, 00:50
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#26
|
![]() |
2009-01-28
, 01:39
|
Posts: 191 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Ottawa
|
#27
|
move to digital does free up a LOT of public airspace on the radio waves. Especially since you can like 10 times the channels via digital in half the space you did with analog. You can stack channels, individual stations can have up to like 9 channels all on the same frequency instead of just one like before.
![]() |
2009-01-28
, 01:43
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 137 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Boone, IA
|
#28
|
Quipper8 - What have people in your area been using as a VCR replacement for OTA timed recording of favorite shows?
![]() |
2009-01-28
, 06:12
|
|
Posts: 1,562 |
Thanked: 349 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#29
|
DTV looks great if you can get it. But my experience, is that it just doesn't have the range (read: distance) that analog TV does, which is a problem if you don't live near a big city
Craig...
![]() |
2009-01-28
, 06:25
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#30
|
Where there is a _shared_ resource, it is usually a good idea to defer regulation thereof to a third party to govern access (the Government) which in an ideal world is appointed by, and acts int the best interest of, the collective owners of the resource.
In the Real World, this third party (or their agents) are usually in the pockets of whoever has money, but that's a technicality.
Now, in the case of spectrum, let's compare the US and Canada to The Rest Of The World. One has GSM, the other has CDMA, GSM, and probably still some TDMA here and there. In one, users can generally freely buy whatever device they like as long as it conforms to the Government standard, in the other, you have to use whatever your carrier chooses you can have. Yes, you can freely choose carriers, but this is also the case in the more developed parts of The Rest.
Cars are generally not a shared resource (though the air we breathe and the roads we drive on are) so the argument is less relevant for regulation. If taxation for things that affect the shared resource are increased, the market will encourage individuals to choose differently. If individuals can save on taxes by choosing a lower emission vehicle, the market should find the most efficient way to provide this to consumers - and is not constrained to any particular technology choice by decree. Bring on the plug-ins and high-efficiency diesels!