![]() |
2009-03-18
, 19:51
|
|
Posts: 1,076 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#22
|
![]() |
2009-03-18
, 20:46
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#23
|
![]() |
2009-03-18
, 21:04
|
Posts: 874 |
Thanked: 316 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ London UK
|
#24
|
hehe ... i really, really love you for this public documentation of how poor the UI actually is. how easily people overlook or misinterpret the two basic gestures fennec invented out of the blue for no reason.
where should i send the beer?
(if you wonder now what this comment is all about: i had quite a few arguments here about the fennec UI, saying that it is not intuitive, while a lot of others insisted it is. you're my real-life experiment. i was right.
![]() |
2009-03-18
, 21:40
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#25
|
Tips and tricks
* to use the full screen for browsing, click the button on the left hand side on top of the device (to the left of the -/+ buttons)
* swipe left to expose back/forward/bookmark buttons and the URL bar; swipe right to dismiss them
* swipe right to expose tabs; swipe left to dismiss them
![]() |
2009-03-18
, 23:35
|
Posts: 874 |
Thanked: 316 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ London UK
|
#26
|
![]() |
2009-03-19
, 01:32
|
Posts: 169 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Brooklyn, NY
|
#27
|
Text has to be translated. Pictures/symbols you learn once and you're done with them.
How? Is this for iPhoneOS applications in general? I surely haven't figured this out yet. I keep scrolling to the top.
I'm not sure about this. To me, this sounds like a sensibility issue of the touchscreen. The way the interface works in this regard (related to gestures) should be consistent. Even if you find a feature illogic, it should at least be consistenly illogic
![]() |
2009-03-19
, 01:39
|
Posts: 169 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Brooklyn, NY
|
#28
|
![]() |
2009-03-19
, 02:36
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
|
#29
|
That's exactly what it is: People playing around re-inventing everything from the ground up for no real reason, making up excuses for it afterwards and trying to convince people that they have problems with their current browsers.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to theillien For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-03-19
, 13:49
|
Posts: 169 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Brooklyn, NY
|
#30
|
I like the icons. They make sense to me. I agree that using icons over text is the most logical method for an internationally used application.
Text has to be translated. Pictures/symbols you learn once and you're done with them. If you prefer a touch UI browser which uses a lot of text then you can use a different one, like MicroB. I can assure you however, that in my case, I'd love to have S60Browser give me more feedback in pictures/icons/symbols. Hmm, lets see...
Options on left button -> touch the button and the options are (translated):
* Subscription (on what? RSS feeds, a RSS symbol with a + would be a welcome substitution)
** "RSS feed name one"
** "RSS feed name two"
* Go to address (replacement for URI bar)
* Bookmarks
* Save as bookmark
* Navigation options
** Reload
** History
** Page oversight
* Full screen
* Zoom options
** 50%
** 75%
** 100%
** 125%
* Window
** Move between windows
** Close
** Allow pop-ups
* Clean privacy related data
** All
** Clean cache
** Delete cookies
** History
** Form.-/wachtwrdgeg. (???)
* Instruments
** Show workbox (not clear what this is)
** Change connection
** Disconnect
** Save page
** Send page
** Info about page
* Search
** Text
** Telnumber
** E-mail address
* Settings
* Printoptions
** Print page
** Page settings
** Example
** Printers (Not I do not even have a printer configured on the device...)
* Help
* Quit
The right button on the S60 device allows one to go a page back or close the window. Thank god. However all the above is there in text form and I keep searching my *** off. Had they used conventional symbols instead... and some words (maybe due to translation) make no sense whatsoever. They are not descriptive.
If you look at it from this angle text is not necessarily good. It takes up more page than symbols as well. When the EU was formed there was a goal to harmonize the traffic signs. Some countries had some really odd ones which were not conventional. Some differences were slight. Here, standards are to be set as well.
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!