![]() |
2009-09-19
, 09:34
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#21
|
![]() |
2009-09-19
, 09:58
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#22
|
Is the difference really in the CPU itself (ie, does a halted Atom still draw significant amounts of power) or in the PC architecture baggage that Atom has to drag along for Windows compatibility?
a "mainstream" Windows ARM port (like they used to support AXP, PPC & MIPS and back in the NT days).
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-09-19
, 10:24
|
|
Posts: 250 |
Thanked: 122 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ Colorado
|
#23
|
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 22:29
|
|
Posts: 1,716 |
Thanked: 3,007 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#24
|
Microsoft should be really scared if ARM's initiative takes off as this is a segment it cannot compete in (none of the drastic measures they used to fight their way back to netbook space is available with an ARM in the arena - except for bribery and blackmail).
![]() |
2010-08-16
, 01:50
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#25
|
![]() |
2010-08-16
, 03:40
|
|
Posts: 485 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Galiza
|
#26
|