Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#21
Originally Posted by Bratag View Post
What I have noticed is this - images that are taken at 5MP should be fairly large - instead we end up with ~800k images. My suspicion is that Nokia have done the same thing Google did in order to get speedy writes to the sdcard. They have dropped the Jpeg quality to < 100%

Its difficult for me to be able to verify this unfortunately. Anyone with a little more knowledge than me care to weigh in on this?
diffraction makes most of the 5mpix unused. all the details disappear and small sensor makes much noise and noise removal removes rest of the details.

there is about nothing significant to do with software with cameras integrated to cellphones etc. and decreasing jpeg quality probably makes no realistic difference....

a small example:
you can stretch this heavily cropped (100% crop) image taken from 4mpix raw image data about 2-3x or more and the quality is better than with N900's 100% crop.

__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
 
Posts: 84 | Thanked: 11 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Tricase, Lecce (ITA)
#22
in wide mode the camera is better than 4/3 mode.

In the 5 mp mode, the images are not vivid such as in 3.5 mode.

I did many test and when i will time, i post some example
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18.