![]() |
2009-12-07
, 22:36
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#22
|
![]() |
2009-12-07
, 22:53
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#23
|
IMAP IDLE is the best solution, with optimal battery drain and quick performance. Nokia is making a mistake betting on Nokia Messaging. They've been working on this service for years now with pathetic results. It can't send me more than about ten emails in a row without thoroughly choking on the eleventh. On the plus side Nokia Messaging at least sends me a blank page so I know that an email was sent and I can track it down using other email clients, but seriously now, how can they hang onto this failing service without seeing the failure rate and responding in some sort of a positive manner? Profimail has been demonstrating excellence in this area for years now. It's too bad Nokia devices require a third party solution for true, reliable push email. And the frustration is compounded for N900 users because the device uses a new operating system and Profimail's publishers must recode the program if N900 users are to have a practical push email solution. Where is Nokia in all this? Isn't it time to for them to go beyond collecting and reading bug reports and to provide their users with a serious, practical solution. How many years longer must we wait?
![]() |
2009-12-08
, 00:35
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 56 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oviedo, Florida
|
#24
|
Do we really have to pester people to "vote" for bugs in order for nokia to add functionality that should have been implemented in the first place?
![]() |
2009-12-08
, 12:02
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#25
|
![]() |
2009-12-08
, 12:33
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#26
|
IMAP IDLE is the best solution, with optimal battery drain and quick performance.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-08
, 12:57
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#27
|
![]() |
2009-12-08
, 16:25
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#28
|
30 minutes is better than 1. I want my e-mail when it arrives at the server.
![]() |
2009-12-08
, 16:35
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#29
|
![]() |
2009-12-25
, 11:14
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#30
|
Edit: Technically, this is not the requirement. After refreshing my memory of RFC 2177 (it's been a while), it is "advised to terminate the IDLE and re-issue it at least every 29 minutes to avoid being logged off". So this would be completely dependent on the server configuration - and probably something that should be a default, but remain configurable on the client end.
Last edited by rewt; 2009-12-07 at 21:13.