![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:14
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#21
|
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:16
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#22
|
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:23
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Washington, DC
|
#23
|
I'd be happy with that comparison, because that's exactly what it is. (As long as they didn't try to suggest that Nokia should have implemented it on 2002 hardware in order to not be a copycat.)
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:23
|
|
Posts: 232 |
Thanked: 102 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Warren, MI, USA
|
#24
|
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 232 |
Thanked: 102 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Warren, MI, USA
|
#25
|
There two things that I noticed in the video review that were inaccurate.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/19/nokia-n900-review/
2. Minute 18:08. He presses the power button to get to the phone and then says that it’s not supported in landscape mode. He must have the Display Orientation set to ‘Portrait’ instead of ‘Automatic’ in the Turning Control menu.
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 1,839 |
Thanked: 2,432 times |
Joined on May 2009
|
#26
|
While I certainly wouldn't call the Pre a smashing success (being tied to Sprint for the launch pretty much guaranteed that wasn't going to be the case), I don't think for an instant that the N900 will sell more units.
Nokia doesn't release sales info for the N900 (except to say that it's "met expectations"), and Palm doesn't break sales figures out by device, but just the fact that the Pre is sold subsidized I'd argue pretty much means it'll sell more (and as it's Palm's hail mary pass to stay relevant, it had better).
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:50
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Washington, DC
|
#27
|
I believe most countries got at least one carrier in Europe that got N900. I wouldn't be surprised to see 1 million sales from N900 at the end. Not from Q4 that's for sure with the limited supply and many Asian countries are getting the N900 in Q1.
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 21:53
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#28
|
While I certainly wouldn't call the Pre a smashing success (being tied to Sprint for the launch pretty much guaranteed that wasn't going to be the case), I don't think for an instant that the N900 will sell more units.
...just the fact that the Pre is sold subsidized I'd argue pretty much means it'll sell more...
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 22:11
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Washington, DC
|
#29
|
Are you speaking of just within the U.S. or world wide? I haven't really followed Pre news, but didn't it only become available in markets outside the U.S. at roughly the same time as the N900 was released? Also, isn't the Pre only sold "SIM free" in some countries? I know the N900 can be had for "free" with a contract in, again, some countries. Unless I'm mistaken, comparing the sales of the two devices seems to be more complicated than Pre-subsidized vs. N900-unsubsidized.
![]() |
2010-01-19
, 22:16
|
Posts: 377 |
Thanked: 97 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ US
|
#30
|
The Chinese devices you're referring to actually runs Diablo (Maemo 4.x). If it's the one that I'm thinking of, it's basically an N800 clone and TOTALLY looks like an illegal KIRF-like device.