Active Topics
-
[HOWTO] Comprehensive Firmware Flashing Guide for N9 (1,580)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by aspergerguy - 5 hrs, 43 mins ago -
Nokia N9-00 Prototype Build S1.12 (RM-680 codename "Dali") (250)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by en0s - 3 days, 2 hrs ago -
[Announce] Maebble - Pebble support for Maemo (118)
to Applications by glo-worm - 3 days, 14 hrs ago -
Possible to flash Leste to eMMC? (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Eri - 4 days, 4 hrs ago - more...
 |
kryptoniankid17 |
2010-02-04
, 09:19
|
|
Posts: 297 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ new jersey, usa
|
#21
|
Come on n98 dont be a n97 nokia lets get this right
 |
|
2010-02-04
, 10:36
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#22
|
I still don't fully understand the license they chose (EPL). The EPL FAQ-page states that it's somehow copyleft, meaning that you have to distribute your changes to an EPL-licensed application under the EPL again and must not distribute a proprietary binary only.
On the other hand, it says it's perfactly legal to re-license EPL-licensed code under a commercial license if you don't change it.
Finally, the FAQ states it's incompatible to both the GPLv2 and the GPLv3.
GPL-incompatibility worries me. What worries me even more is that they can re-license the "open" code and distribute it as non-open binary (as long as they don't make changes), which is what I don't like about Android.
It means that although they claim Symbian is open, it's perfactly legal to distribute Symbian on handsets as closed source with a license that explicitely says: "You must not make any changes to the software on your handset, must not distribute it,... " etc.
Is there anyone how knows more about these legal issues?
On the other hand, it says it's perfactly legal to re-license EPL-licensed code under a commercial license if you don't change it.
Finally, the FAQ states it's incompatible to both the GPLv2 and the GPLv3.
GPL-incompatibility worries me. What worries me even more is that they can re-license the "open" code and distribute it as non-open binary (as long as they don't make changes), which is what I don't like about Android.
It means that although they claim Symbian is open, it's perfactly legal to distribute Symbian on handsets as closed source with a license that explicitely says: "You must not make any changes to the software on your handset, must not distribute it,... " etc.
Is there anyone how knows more about these legal issues?
|
|
2010-02-04
, 10:50
|
|
Posts: 288 |
Thanked: 196 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London
|
#23
|
What becomes of Android now ?. Why would a manufacturer bother with google controlled Android when a more stable and arguably open Symbian is available and not subject to the machinations of the increasingly anti-privacy google ? - e.g. promoting Nexus1and adding features to it (mtouch, eclair etc) at expense of other Andoid devices. No wonder Symbian is predicted to continue to rule the roost. Dont forget that MS Office (love or loathe) for Symbian is currently under development in India. RESPECT to Nokia for making this move in addition to Ovi maps, Maemo - they are really aiming at Google as iApple will eventually dwindle into its usual niche.
|
|
2010-02-04
, 14:34
|
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#24
|
 |
|
2010-02-04
, 14:40
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#25
|
Wont be long before Symbian 3 is ported to the N900 
__________________
N900_Email_Options Wiki Page
N900_Email_Options Wiki Page
|
|
2010-02-04
, 14:42
|
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#26
|
It's available now: http://tiny.symbian.org/open
|
|
2010-02-04
, 14:46
|
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#27
|
Originally Posted by mikec
I know you are joking, but there are obviously *parts* of symbian that should be ported to maemo to give a more complete common phone experience.
Wont be long before Symbian 3 is ported to the N900
|
|
2010-02-04
, 14:48
|
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London, UK
|
#28
|
To be honest i think of Symbian as the old warhouse that should be just put out of its missery.
It was a nightmare for developers to code for and it should of been more how developing an app for Maemo is now, nice and easy with the ability to engage the community.
Go with Maemo and forget Symbian is what i say !!
It was a nightmare for developers to code for and it should of been more how developing an app for Maemo is now, nice and easy with the ability to engage the community.
Go with Maemo and forget Symbian is what i say !!
 |
|
2010-02-04
, 15:21
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#30
|
Originally Posted by sandybeach
That is why they are setting down on Qt for both Maemo and Symbian.
To be honest i think of Symbian as the old warhouse that should be just put out of its missery.
It was a nightmare for developers to code for and it should of been more how developing an app for Maemo is now, nice and easy with the ability to engage the community.
Go with Maemo and forget Symbian is what i say !!
__________________
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.
Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.
Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!
| The Following User Says Thank You to mrojas For This Useful Post: | ||