![]() |
2010-02-12
, 13:41
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
|
#22
|
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 13:48
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#23
|
Talking about user restrictions of a future release of Maemo might not be the best move especially if you use marketing terms as PC-like and OpenSource.
Good luck dealing with GPLv3.
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 13:56
|
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#24
|
Well - that is if you are targetting GPLv3. I seem to recall this question coming up at the Maemo 6 security talk in Amsterdam. Peter got up right away, and confirmed that Maemo 6 would be GPLv2 compliant.
(from my recollection - please correct me if I was wrong in my understanding)
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 15:55
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 199 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ turku, finland
|
#25
|
Well - that is if you are targetting GPLv3. I seem to recall this question coming up at the Maemo 6 security talk in Amsterdam. Peter got up right away, and confirmed that Maemo 6 would be GPLv2 compliant.
(from my recollection - please correct me if I was wrong in my understanding)
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 15:58
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#26
|
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 18:53
|
Posts: 1,751 |
Thanked: 844 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#27
|
![]() |
2010-02-12
, 21:42
|
Posts: 158 |
Thanked: 67 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#28
|
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 04:23
|
|
Posts: 1,684 |
Thanked: 1,562 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Austin, TX
|
#29
|
PPS. I spoke to Niels immediately after Elena's talk and there are two useful things we can do on Downloads and/or Packages: showing the capabilities requested by a package (by parsing its Aegis manifest) whilst a user is browsing the apps (before having to install it), and making the autobuilder check that an app doesn't request any privileges which aren't available to apps available through Extras.
![]() |
2010-02-13
, 14:18
|
|
Posts: 1,684 |
Thanked: 1,562 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Austin, TX
|
#30
|
I'm kind of disappointed by Nokia. And not only in just that implementation of "trusted computing" (it maybe not that bad, I don't know, please give us some more real details), but mostly I'm disappointed by the trend.
Trusted computing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0FAaah8jgY
No, thanks.