|
2010-04-11
, 11:18
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#22
|
Actually., so how do one figure out whose is running as per the MHz? and is it doing any performance boost as per this benchmark?
|
2010-04-11
, 11:31
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 109 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#23
|
|
2010-04-11
, 11:39
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#24
|
|
2010-04-11
, 11:56
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 109 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#25
|
Hmm. No idea what that error means sorry.
btw, I have just updated my post with 800mhz results also.
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...9&postcount=17
|
2010-04-11
, 12:29
|
Posts: 292 |
Thanked: 131 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#26
|
|
2010-04-11
, 12:34
|
Posts: 946 |
Thanked: 1,650 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#27
|
|
2010-04-11
, 12:44
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#28
|
2) Floating point is way behind. Maybe FP instructions are being emulated. I wonder if there is any way to recompile the benchmark with NEON support (also, will it help)?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-11
, 15:13
|
Posts: 1,751 |
Thanked: 844 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#29
|
|
2010-04-11
, 15:51
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#30
|
It is compiled with NEON. With emulated FPU it is much slower. Maybe VFP will give better results.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post: | ||
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 329.68 : 8.45 : 2.78
STRING SORT : 58.017 : 25.92 : 4.01
BITFIELD : 1.1159e+08 : 19.14 : 4.00
FP EMULATION : 82.32 : 39.50 : 9.11
FOURIER : 1544.2 : 1.76 : 0.99
ASSIGNMENT : 5.3255 : 20.26 : 5.26
IDEA : 887.59 : 13.58 : 4.03
HUFFMAN : 517.12 : 14.34 : 4.58
NEURAL NET : 1.6193 : 2.60 : 1.09
LU DECOMPOSITION : 60.551 : 3.14 : 2.27
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 18.170
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.429
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU :
L2 Cache :
OS : Linux 2.6.28-omap1
C compiler : gcc version 4.2.1
libc :
MEMORY INDEX : 4.385
INTEGER INDEX : 4.649
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.347
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
Last edited by baron von bubba; 2010-04-11 at 11:44. Reason: 800 not 1GHz