![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:34
|
|
Posts: 378 |
Thanked: 206 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Denmark
|
#21
|
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:37
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#22
|
In response to the California police raid on Gizmodo editor Jason Chen’s home, Gawker Media is arguing that the search and seizure was illegal because California law precludes a warrant being used to ascertain the name of a journalistic source.
Gizmodo’s interpretation of the law, however, entirely misses the point. The impetus for the warrant appears to be rooted in Gizmodo’s commission of a felony, namely the purchase of an iPhone they had reason to believe was stolen property.
Shield laws in the US were designed to protect sources, but by entering into a contract with said source (5 grand in exchange for the iPhone), Gizmodo was no longer just the recipient of information, but an active participant in the commission of a felony - hence the warrant.
Despite Giz’s arguments to the contrary, the warrant is 100% kosher.
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:39
|
|
Posts: 1,111 |
Thanked: 1,985 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Åbo, Finland
|
#23
|
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:42
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#24
|
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:44
|
Posts: 726 |
Thanked: 345 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#25
|
You mean "journalist" is a term you have to qualify for? Who do we apply to? You? The governor?
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:44
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#26
|
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:45
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#27
|
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:51
|
Posts: 726 |
Thanked: 345 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#29
|
But thats the thing... a public blog can be considered a news source (according to some), and they are protected by laws dealing with such.
![]() |
2010-04-27
, 06:59
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#30
|