Page 3 of 7 12 3 45 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
Texrat's Avatar
Texrat is offline Texrat
2010-06-10 , 15:37
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#21
Very well put Jaffa.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
SpeedEvil's Avatar
SpeedEvil is offline SpeedEvil
2010-06-12 , 10:52
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 410 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Fife, Scotland.
#22
What would be needed to be perfectly fine legally would be to take the chrome repository, and fork it.

This fork would need to have none of the source-code of courgette - that would need totally ripped out of any revision history that was kept.

Then build a binary from that.

You will certainly win any court case that ensues, if competently represented.

However, that does not mean that you, or if it's a Nokia repository, Nokia, won't face time in court - for which you may not get your costs back.
Last edited by SpeedEvil; 2010-06-12 at 11:20. Reason: add lawyer
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SpeedEvil For This Useful Post:
SD69 is offline SD69
2010-06-13 , 16:15
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#23
Perhaps this is an opportunity to consider the benefits of having maemo.org governance be more independent. It would be to Nokia's benefit because they would not be liable for the actions of maemo.org. It would be to our benefit because we could make our own decisions.

I think such proposal has been invited in the past:

http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=166

and this Chromium issue may raise the interest of Nokia in accomplishing the transition at the present time.
__________________
3-time Maemo Community Council Member
Co-Founder, Hildon Foundation
 
Jaffa's Avatar
Jaffa is offline Jaffa
2010-06-13 , 16:58
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#24
Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
Perhaps this is an opportunity to consider the benefits of having maemo.org governance be more independent. It would be to Nokia's benefit because they would not be liable for the actions of maemo.org.
As I said, it's already raised this and discussions have started:

http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...1&postcount=20

It would be to our benefit because we could make our own decisions.
The process here was very open and collaborative with the council. Obviously, I wasn't on the council during the Nintendo affair, but I get the impression Nokia have learnt how to improve their collaboration with the community in these circumstances.

Indeed, if anyone was lacking, it was the council in responding in a timely manner: if we can't act professionally on these very important issues (certainly important to Nokia), we lose credibility.

...and this Chromium issue may raise the interest of Nokia in accomplishing the transition at the present time.
Whoever is running the show, ultimately someone - and very possibly an individual - is going to get a C&D letter like the one Nokia got. Unless we built up a large legal fund (or had lawyers willing to work pro bono) the result on this Chromium decision would've been the same: remove the package as an act of good faith whilst you try to have a dialogue to reach an amicable settlement.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post:
SD69 is offline SD69
2010-06-13 , 17:24
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#25
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
As I said, it's already raised this and discussions have started:

http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...1&postcount=20

The process here was very open and collaborative with the council. Obviously, I wasn't on the council during the Nintendo affair, but I get the impression Nokia have learnt how to improve their collaboration with the community in these circumstances.
Yes, I read that post. It suggested everything was being discussed and governance was being revisited and , but wasn't specific and I am specifically proposing the legal entity that qgil suggested.


Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
Whoever is running the show, ultimately someone - and very possibly an individual - is going to get a C&D letter like the one Nokia got. Unless we built up a large legal fund (or had lawyers willing to work pro bono) the result on this Chromium decision would've been the same: remove the package as an act of good faith whilst you try to have a dialogue to reach an amicable settlement.
If for example a non-profit foundation is formed, then it would insulate individuals from liability as well as Nokia. Not to say that the C&D letter won't be received, but the situation changes radically in that instance. If Nokia is clearly out of the picture, then they don't have much incentive to threaten a non-profit foundation. While the decision not to offer a piece of software may be the same in a particular instance, there is more latitude.

Also, there are benefits to such a structure in other circumstances which is why Linux Foundation exists, etc., to support the software rather than make profits.
__________________
3-time Maemo Community Council Member
Co-Founder, Hildon Foundation
 
Jaffa's Avatar
Jaffa is offline Jaffa
2010-06-13 , 17:26
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#26
Indeed, good points.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 
D4rKlar's Avatar
D4rKlar is offline D4rKlar
2010-06-16 , 07:57
Posts: 675 | Thanked: 923 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#27
Quick question, I've got this package for an old app that has been discontinued, how hard is it to make a .deb file out of a .tar.gz?
__________________
_________________________
_________________________________
_
* D4rKlar on DeviantART * Maemo5 on DeviantART *
_
* M4riNa D4rK Theme and Iconset *
_
 
rich c is offline rich c
2010-06-16 , 08:43
Posts: 80 | Thanked: 40 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ UK
#28
This might be a place to start...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to rich c For This Useful Post:
ZogG's Avatar
ZogG is offline ZogG
2010-06-16 , 09:02
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#29
WTF? there is chrome and chromium, and second is freeware and is under opensource licence for linux, and is maemo one of the linux distros - what's the problem?
 
inoshishi is offline inoshishi
2010-06-16 , 09:20
Posts: 42 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Belgium
#30
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
WTF? there is chrome and chromium, and second is freeware and is under opensource licence for linux, and is maemo one of the linux distros - what's the problem?
OpenSource does not mean that it does not infringe a patent.

But if the patent can hold in court, this is only for US citizens. Nokia should do what Debian did. Have a US repository and a non-US repository. The US would be limited in content by their patent laws, the non-US would not obey non-US laws. I don't see why a lawsuit in the US should prevent everyone in the world to use Chromium.
__________________
Python module to download subtitles. With Nautilus and Totem integration:
http://code.google.com/p/periscope

Looking for beta testers for a price comparison engine:
http://www.shoptimate.com
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to inoshishi For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 3 of 7 12 3 45 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top