Reply
Thread Tools
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#21
Originally Posted by slender View Post
lmgtfy

http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/
Thanks. I did say ****ing please.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Posts: 102 | Thanked: 114 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#22
The NYTimes is just a liberal rag spouting lies...DAMNED LIES!

Nokia is the greatest phone company on the face of the planet. End of story.

The Blackberry Torch and the PlayBook are gonna revolutionize the industry. Meego is so much better than iOS or Android. Its much more powerful and has a better UI.

Nokia gives customers what they want.

Nokia FTW!

Apple, Android, NYTimes are FAIL!

(Now you guys know how I feel when I read most of the posts on this board.)
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to techngro For This Useful Post:
longcat's Avatar
Posts: 333 | Thanked: 153 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ blah blah
#23
Originally Posted by techngro View Post
The NYTimes is just a liberal rag spouting lies...DAMNED LIES!
I so agree about this first line, else was tl;dr
 
Posts: 249 | Thanked: 167 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ International
#24
@ slender

Thanks for the link! I enjoyed
http://communities-dominate.blogs.co...-platform.html

it puts a slightly different spin on perspectives.
__________________
How to ask questions the smart way
He who smiles in a crisis has found someone to blame.
Shirts get dirty. Underwear gets dirty. Pants? Pants never get dirty, and you can wear them forever.
My Favourite posts!
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=539
http://forums.precentral.net/2674180-post149.html
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=500
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=63720
 

The Following User Says Thank You to gryedouge For This Useful Post:
Posts: 29 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on May 2010
#25
Read the article. Have to agree with it 100%.
I kept banging on about how they should have spun out development to ninja teams who have a blank canvas and are free to do whatever they want. I wasn't the only one. But it seems taking risks was not an option.. not in the least. Nokia try to mitigate every risk and the result is.. well designed by commitee. Just get stuff out the door. But ironically this risk mitigation backfires sometimes.. just look at how delayed the N8 is..
No cutting edge method allowed. I found it totally depressing that alot of the internal tools used .NET instead of open source tools.
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#26
Originally Posted by techngro View Post
(Now you guys know how I feel when I read most of the posts on this board.)
Right, since we're not riding along with regretting and hating ourselves (and Nokia) for buying an N900? It seems that anyone who doesn't blindly roll with the Nokia hate is immediately labeled a fanboy.

So I'm not allowed to think one way or the other, I must either be a blind fanboy or a blind hater, right?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,179 | Thanked: 770 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#27
Originally Posted by quipper8 View Post
and for chinese, resistive is way better

case in point, the motorola mt810, a capacitive android phone with a flip down resistive screen(mainly for chinese input)
Capacitive is far better for the mainstream and so Nokia need to switch to capacitive if they want to make a very successful mass market device and stay relevant at all in the mainstream rather than just the geek community.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to etuoyo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,225 | Thanked: 3,822 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Florida
#28
Originally Posted by etuoyo View Post
Capacitive is far better for the mainstream and so Nokia need to switch to capacitive if they want to make a very successful mass market device and stay relevant at all in the mainstream rather than just the geek community.
*Sigh* The average consumer won't even care. You tell them capacitive is amazing, they'll cum all over themselves when they get one. You tell them resistive is amazing, they'll do the same for those.

At the end of the day, the mainstream is fickle, and more importantly, rather mindless. I mean, you're on the Maemo forum, no? You felt the N900's screen? I don't care how much firmware changes f'ed things up, that's a damn good, sensitive screen. And we already know there's Stantum screens that can do multitouch on resistive screens. Which is pretty much the only legit advantage the capacitive screen held. The average user would be more than happy with the resistive options that will soon be available, if only they actually cared about it as anything more than the words they hear ads tossing about.

The only other "advantage" is that you can't actually touch a capacitive screen with a semi-conductive surface without it registering a touch without you locking the screen first. 'cept that's really not an advantage, in my eyes. Ultimately, with resistive technology being as good as it is nowadays, they can be nearly as sensitive, and it won't be long until they are as sensitive, to human perception, as capacitive ones; and we already know that done right, they can support multitouch (vis-a-vis Stantum screens).
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mentalist Traceur For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#29
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
With all of the people declaring that each and every motherlovin' article that doesn't come from some obscure website that loves every-goshdarn thing that Nokia has done is pushed aside to some USA-centric, Euro-unfriendly, or whatever else is applicable label and not one article that has facts, disputes the successes at the risk of being a bit on the edge of critiquing Nokia... well, I'm waiting on that kind of article.

Nobody wants to admit that some of Nokia's choices have been counter-intuitive and nonsensical in some aspects.

No. So let's see a counter article. Let's see somebody write an article that isn't blind praise, or blind antagonism.

That's my request.
Rather hyperbolic.

It's a given that the leading trade media is located in the US (or UK) and have shown themselves to be flagrantly biased against Nokia (and many other European companies). What's so hard about highlighting Nokia errors objectively and leaving the needless sensationalism out (*cough engadget* cough gismodo cough*)? Nokia has made plenty of goofs that don't need additional embellishment by fanboys of competitors.

I get a kick out of statements lambasting Nokia defenders (some deservedly) while blithely ignoring the even more egregious acts and statements of others. But it's only fun for so long.

By the way, I've written the sort of article you seek, many times. No acknowledgment? Bummer.

Originally Posted by etuoyo View Post
Capacitive is far better for the mainstream and so Nokia need to switch to capacitive if they want to make a very successful mass market device and stay relevant at all in the mainstream rather than just the geek community.
Geez I wish we could just get past this sort of opinion parading as fact.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,179 | Thanked: 770 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#30
Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur View Post
*Sigh* The average consumer won't even care. You tell them capacitive is amazing, they'll cum all over themselves when they get one. You tell them resistive is amazing, they'll do the same for those.

At the end of the day, the mainstream is fickle, and more importantly, rather mindless. I mean, you're on the Maemo forum, no? You felt the N900's screen?
Strongly disagree there. My first proper experience of a touch screen was the N97. It was a nightmare (as with everything else with the device) and I returned it after three days. I had bought it to replace my N95 and creative zen mp3. Went back to my N95 and bought an iod touch. The ipod touch screen was super amazing. In three months of owning the device I never ever made a single selection error. It just worked perfectly.

After three months my Apple hatred meant I could not take having an ipod anymore and sold it. Went back my creative zen waiting till the time the N900 came out and it could replace my zen and N95. Yes the N900 screen is good. For a resistive. For me it is still lightyears behind that of the ipod touch and I am pretty sure the general public agrees. Has nothing to do with what they have been told. Yes you can use a stylus but the general public do not even want to have to bring out a stylus. They just want to use their fingers. Yes you can do cool paint stuff but how many care?

You may feel it is US media that has pushed all manufacturers to capacitive screens but I totally disagree. That is just what works better for most. Take someone from the amazon jungle that has never seen a phone before or heard of ipod and give him an N900 and an iphone to try out. Pretty sure he will find the iphone screen easier to use.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:21.