Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#21
this trick is kinda old (i actually use it) didn't include it in batterypatch
cause different N900s have different abilities
but i think this will increase the standby time but if you used the settings loading ideal and limiting to 1150
it will decrease the continues usage time (very much)

so instead of using the ideal and 500 1150 : use the profile you usually use
whatever it is
 

The Following User Says Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 57 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#22
Originally Posted by karam View Post
this trick is kinda old (i actually use it) didn't include it in batterypatch
cause different N900s have different abilities
but i think this will increase the standby time but if you used the settings loading ideal and limiting to 1150
it will decrease the continues usage time (very much)

so instead of using the ideal and 500 1150 : use the profile you usually use
whatever it is
i amusing your custom-karam profile..should i use it with this patch? or change it to default. if you kindly specify the answer to my question it would be helpful
 
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#23
you can use both together
but if you want
wait for my next batterypatch update (this will make you decide easier)
 
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 57 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#24
****..i already installed this patch.rebooted.lockd my device and unlocked it. in maxcpu it shows 500mhz. when i try to overclock it.it says max cpu limit reached and it shows 1150Mhz.what shud be the settings of usr/local/bin/overclock. if i am using custom-karam profile as my default profile?

Last edited by trisha02; 2011-09-04 at 18:00.
 
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 57 times | Joined on Jun 2011
#25
plz tell me how to remove thi s patch..i am totally confused. max cpu isshowing 500mhz. healthcheck doest show any freq (neither available noractive) everything is blank.standby time is less.( i slept at 3 a.m with 35% wokeup at 11 at 25%. i want your advices. plzzz

Last edited by trisha02; 2011-09-05 at 09:23.
 
Posts: 28 | Thanked: 17 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Barbados
#26
Originally Posted by trisha02 View Post
plz tell me how to remove thi s patch..i am totally confused. max cpu isshowing 500mhz. healthcheck doest show any freq (neither available noractive) everything is blank.standby time is less.( i slept at 3 a.m with 35% wokeup at 11 at 25%. i want your advices. plzzz
you honestly need to stop installing everything you see....honestly

its like you like making the same mistakes over & over again
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to T4UR14N For This Useful Post:
ammyt's Avatar
Posts: 1,918 | Thanked: 3,118 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ My pants
#27
Originally Posted by T4UR14N View Post
you honestly need to stop installing everything you see....honestly

its like you like making the same mistakes over & over again
Gosh I always wanted to say that.
Thanks.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ammyt For This Useful Post:
F2thaK's Avatar
Posts: 4,365 | Thanked: 2,467 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Australia Mate
#28
Originally Posted by ammyt View Post
Lol, glad for you...
You didn't include dbus-scripts-session in /etc/event.d, so the patch won't autostart.
It is a great idea BTW.
does your version autostart??
 
Estel's Avatar
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#29
Back on topic, all of this is pointless, because device with limits 500-900 (or any other) doesn't "sit" on 500 when idle - it effectively underclock to 0 mhz, so You save also on power leakage. Talking in simplified way, CPU do it's job, and then go to "sleep" - every second.

So, if You set limits to lower (i.e 250), You got less time on 0 mhz - every second - cause it takes longer to finish "idle" set of task on 250, than on - for example - 500 mhz.

Furthermore, monitoring every dbus signal use resources and battery power.

Effect is, that You loose battery life, instead of gaining it. Of course people will report increased battery life - via placebo effect - but there is no reason why it should give any real-life gain.
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
Estel's Avatar
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#30
Back on topic, all of this is pointless, because device with limits 500-900 (or any other) doesn't "sit" on 500 when idle - it effectively underclock to 0 mhz, so You save also on power leakage. Talking in simplified way, CPU do it's job, and then go to "sleep" - every second.

So, if You set limits to lower (i.e 250), You got less time on 0 mhz - every second - cause it takes longer to finish "idle" set of task on 250, than on - for example - 500 mhz.

Furthermore, monitoring every dbus signal use resources and battery power.

Effect is, that You loose battery life, instead of gaining it. Of course people will report increased battery life - via placebo effect - but there is no reason why it should give any real-life gain.
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49.