![]() |
2012-05-18
, 17:43
|
Posts: 372 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
|
#21
|
![]() |
2012-05-18
, 20:39
|
|
Posts: 4,118 |
Thanked: 8,901 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Ruhrgebiet, Germany
|
#22
|
Or, you can try swapset. I use it and it works pretty fine.
@peterleinchen
As I've written, way of doing ti via /etc/event.d/ script isn't bad at all, but it got one drawback - boot time is considerably slower, as Maemo need to enable eMMC swap first, then, via Your script, enable microSd swap, and disable eMMC swap.
No, as enabling swap is very fast, it doesnt consume boot time. Further I do not need to disable eMMC swap, as I start SD swap with higher priority. Last I do not disable eMMM swap, as it will not be used anymore at all (lower priority, it would only be used when my swap overloads). Just a few 4-5 MB are left on eMMC which were used during time between ke-recv and my script.
As - at this point - some thing are already swapped (most likely, You run event.d scripts after starting hildon-desktop), they need to be moved from eMMC swpa to microSD swap.
Again no, as I start my script like
start on started ke-recv
and then wait until SD and/or eMMC are mounted.
As desribed above, tme swap ram is not moved back. At least not immediately, but slowly during runtime.
As for using microSD swap together with eMMC swap, I don't recommend it, even with higher priority for microSD swap - it's still "in use", which creates (less, but still), I/O rade with things from optFS.
Just a No, as explained above.
Or at least what I understood with my limited Linux skills.
Also, I'm quite sure, that using loopback file for swap is considerably slower than native swap - as it's with ED loopback image or native partition.
This is a full Yes from your experiences with ED. But I do not know that in detail for swap space.
Again, limited Linux skills.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to peterleinchen For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-05-18
, 21:07
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#23
|
but isnt it possible to make N900 run more faster. the speedpatch doesnt work. its nothin but crap. freezes the phone a lot. overclocking is one way but it doesnt do me any good. my phone is overclocked to 850 running ideal profile but still it freezes for example if a phone call comes when i am browsing. its terrible. my freinds laf at me. where the are using galaxy s and even people using milestone. seriously, there are many times that i even missed a call twice or thrice. what shud i do?
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-05-18
, 21:09
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#24
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-05-18
, 22:17
|
Posts: 1,141 |
Thanked: 781 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Magical Unicorn Land
|
#25
|
my phone is overclocked to 850 running ideal profile but still it freezes for example if a phone call comes when i am browsing. its terrible.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to stlpaul For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-05-19
, 07:30
|
Posts: 669 |
Thanked: 433 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#26
|
but isnt it possible to make N900 run more faster. the speedpatch doesnt work. its nothin but crap. freezes the phone a lot. overclocking is one way but it doesnt do me any good. my phone is overclocked to 850 running ideal profile but still it freezes for example if a phone call comes when i am browsing. its terrible. my freinds laf at me. where the are using galaxy s and even people using milestone. seriously, there are many times that i even missed a call twice or thrice. what shud i do?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to impeham For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-05-19
, 08:17
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#27
|
It happens to most of us. The problem is not CPU speed but lack of RAM on the device and the ensuing swapping I/O storm.
Just yesterday my phone was ringing but the screen didn't turn on or respond until it was too late. N900 is great as a pocket computer, but pretty bad as a telephone because of that kind of thing... in my opinion.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-05-19
, 08:29
|
Posts: 669 |
Thanked: 433 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#28
|
![]() |
2012-05-19
, 13:29
|
Posts: 372 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
|
#29
|
![]() |
2012-05-19
, 13:58
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#30
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||