![]() |
2014-06-05
, 07:30
|
Posts: 669 |
Thanked: 433 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#21
|
![]() |
2014-06-05
, 11:06
|
Posts: 2,292 |
Thanked: 4,135 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#22
|
Thanks Woody, that's exactly where I was heading with that question. I would not expect to connect the receiver's contacts directly to the battery contacts. But, assuming some magic circuit between the two, would the phone's firmware be able to cope with it? Reporting the correct charge, for example?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sixwheeledbeast For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2014-06-05
, 14:52
|
Posts: 1,432 |
Thanked: 2,630 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Touring
|
#23
|
Looking at one of the links above it has been done.
If it is putting strain on the charging circuitry inside the device it yet to be proven.
It seems the battery charges without the device knowing about it. I would assume shorting the Data pins would trick the device into thinking it's charging.
![]() |
2014-06-05
, 21:31
|
|
Posts: 1,455 |
Thanked: 3,309 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Rochester, NY
|
#24
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2014-06-05
, 21:33
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Jun 2014
@ Poland
|
#25
|
Having current bypass USB +5V/USB ground pads mean that you will never get values measured correctly by bq27x00_battery module. Current must pass through charging chip, data pins shorted or not.
Again, shorting data pins by opto or whatsnot is not necessary if you use Pali's BME replacement (no reasons why you shouldn't). Just use the echo'ing thing everytime you want dedicated charging. Also, you can just wire charger to USB +5V/ground pads under battery, it *will* make current go through charger, and bq27x00_battery will get calibrated.
BTW, there is no real-life risk while using pads under battery, unlike what joerg said. They lack common-mode-choke and some external rudimentary second defense line as opposed to going through normal N900's microUSB port, but charging and USB chip still have it's build-in protection, rated few kV (seven, if memory serve... Or was it eleven? Anyway, much more than you will ever need). AFAIK, robbiethe1st uses this method for years, since his USB port died beyond repair, without any problems. I use it too, for two devices, in very EMI-dangerous places, without any special cables/additional shielding, and it works just fine. No reasons, why it shouldn't, BTW, if you check datasheet of USB and charging chip, noting it's internal protection(s).
Woody's trick with opto's was necessary during times of Nokia's BME, but now, he is obsolete.
![]() |
2014-06-05
, 22:39
|
|
Posts: 1,455 |
Thanked: 3,309 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Rochester, NY
|
#26
|
Hola comrades, I've been requested to post whats below. I hope it helps:
![]() |
2014-06-28
, 20:55
|
Posts: 1,432 |
Thanked: 2,630 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Touring
|
#27
|
![]() |
2014-07-03
, 09:24
|
Posts: 1,432 |
Thanked: 2,630 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Touring
|
#28
|
![]() |
2014-07-03
, 13:25
|
|
Administrator |
Posts: 1,036 |
Thanked: 2,019 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Germany
|
#29
|
![]() |
2014-07-09
, 18:29
|
Posts: 1,432 |
Thanked: 2,630 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Touring
|
#30
|
The Following User Says Thank You to biketool For This Useful Post: | ||