![]() |
2010-12-01
, 11:22
|
|
Posts: 1,391 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#292
|
Same here, the player is useless.
Bug report was opened on August, last commit in July, I guess Panucci is not actively developed.
The Following User Says Thank You to thp For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-01
, 11:40
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#293
|
The 0.9 branch isn't stable, so even if you want to use Panucci, please use 0.3.x. Thanks!
![]() |
2010-12-01
, 20:29
|
Posts: 115 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#294
|
That's very sad.Panucci is at the moment still the best audio player for podcasts.
Panucci has clearly the better solution to rewind in fixed steps
![]() |
2010-12-06
, 13:16
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#296
|
Thinking out loud: What if someone were to come up with a car-friendly UI that remote controls the built-in media player?
The Following User Says Thank You to Helmuth For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-07
, 07:17
|
|
Posts: 1,391 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#297
|
The question is, is it easier to migrate the bluetooth code from panucci 0.3.17 to the current version or to manipulate the built-in player using a small daemon in the background?
The Following User Says Thank You to thp For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-07
, 10:53
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#298
|
That should not be too hard to forward-port (I'm not saying that I'm going to do it). Do YOU want to do it?
I'll happily (very happily in fact!) guide you through the process if you don't know how where to start, and chances are that you might learn something along the way
I thought the remaining reason why people used Panucci were the bigger UI elements compared to the built-in Media Player. Talk about not knowing your user base
The Following User Says Thank You to Helmuth For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-08
, 09:57
|
Posts: 172 |
Thanked: 193 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Germany
|
#299
|
I thought the remaining reason why people used Panucci were the bigger UI elements compared to the built-in Media Player. Talk about not knowing your user base
The Following User Says Thank You to percy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-12-08
, 22:35
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#300
|
Bug report was opened on August, last commit in July, I guess Panucci is not actively developed.
Last edited by Brownout; 2010-11-30 at 11:24.