![]() |
2013-10-03
, 16:50
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#291
|
![]() |
2013-10-03
, 19:56
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#292
|
![]() |
2013-10-03
, 20:03
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#293
|
Really? You think by having the output of free the limitation of 1GB RAM on the N9 can be covered? There is a reason things like FasterN9 exist. Let's not hide flaws and say 1gb is sufficient when the N9 has shown that on boot system libraries and apps/services itself take up 700MB of RAM.
Maybe Wayland brings down the RAM usage to achieve a UI of 60fps because this clearly failed on the N9. Want examples? Refresh your feeds and scroll the home screens; 10fps. Sync all mail accounts and minimise Fenix, try opening phone app etc.
The N900 has been limited among other things mainly by its 256MB RAM, the N9 as we understand now had to have a custom chip to get the 1GB of RAM required and now the Jolla is unfortunately again limited to 1GB of RAM. In an OS that is geared towards true multi tasking, the RAM is really important compared to Android etc.
Does that mean I won't get the Jolla? No, I still want it as it looks the best thing but I won't be surprised with the device being limited by RAM (again)...
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-10-03
, 20:52
|
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 281 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Helsinki
|
#294
|
![]() |
2013-10-03
, 21:18
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#295
|
Let's not hide flaws and say 1gb is sufficient when the N9 has shown that on boot system libraries and apps/services itself take up 700MB of RAM.
EDIT: I stand corrected... you have to use "top" to see the amount cached, for some reason it isn't implemented in free (or maybe if you use bash instead of bb).
BusyBox v1.21.1 (Debian 1.21.1power1+thumb0) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. ~ $ free total used free shared buffers Mem: 235252 229308 5944 0 2580 -/+ buffers: 226728 8524 Swap: 804856 86948 717908 ~ $
(long and comprehensive comparison of various phones' virtual keyboards)
|
2013-10-04
, 00:39
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#296
|
My two cents in discussion off RAM is based on my 4 years old Samsung N140. I upgraded RAM from 1gb to 2gb and it made no difference. My tasks are quite light, but that usage would be heavy when I operate with a smart phone. Ubuntu hardly ever takes even the 1gb. It's the Atom CPU that is limiting the performance on my netbook. I don't want to sound like a fanboy who is defending Jolla, but when discussing RAM usage I really cannot understand why some people just need moar specs.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-10-04
, 02:00
|
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 195 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Malaysia
|
#297
|
![]() |
2013-10-04
, 05:03
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#298
|
![]() |
2013-10-04
, 05:39
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#299
|
![]() |
2013-10-04
, 06:35
|
Posts: 771 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#300
|
Sure, ARM is not x86, but six times more RAM on idle? I maintain that this is the N9's fault.