Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 552 times | Joined on Jul 2011
#291
Originally Posted by Akkumaru View Post
You guys are funny N9's keyboard was AMONG THE BEST virtual keyboard there is to exist. I rarely have mistakes, heck, I can even type without looking iPhone iOS 7's keyboard was a little better, Android's is just horrible.
I quite like Android's keyboard, way better than my old iPhone's (although the issue there may have been the tiddly screen). Android's pretty good at guessing the next word too which saves a lot of time.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to switch-hitter For This Useful Post:
qwazix's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 2,622 | Thanked: 5,447 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#292
Native english speakers might appreciate a good prediction/correction engine, but for me it's the first thing I disable on a new phone. I type a lot non-words, technical jargon, or transliterated Greek on a keyboard and I just want to have what I typed, not what the phone thinks I did.

With the correction disabled, the N9 has the best keyboard because of it's nice haptics and ability to modify layouts, with BB10 coming second (because of no haptics, no dead keys -you have to longpress to type accented characters- and having always capital labels) and WP third. iPhone is distant 4th (inverted dead key sequence order - you have to type the dead key after the letter, wtf!) and second to last comes symbian which for some weird reason seems like having tiny keys on a 4" display, which is bigger than the N9. Last comes android which on anything smaller than 4" is unusable (upside is that you can choose your own vkb there).
__________________
Proud coding competition 2012 winner: ρcam
My other apps: speedcrunch N9 N900 Jolla –– contactlaunch –– timenow

Nemo UX blog: Grog
My website: qwazix.com
My job: oob
 

The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#293
Originally Posted by thedead1440 View Post
Really? You think by having the output of free the limitation of 1GB RAM on the N9 can be covered? There is a reason things like FasterN9 exist. Let's not hide flaws and say 1gb is sufficient when the N9 has shown that on boot system libraries and apps/services itself take up 700MB of RAM.

Maybe Wayland brings down the RAM usage to achieve a UI of 60fps because this clearly failed on the N9. Want examples? Refresh your feeds and scroll the home screens; 10fps. Sync all mail accounts and minimise Fenix, try opening phone app etc.

The N900 has been limited among other things mainly by its 256MB RAM, the N9 as we understand now had to have a custom chip to get the 1GB of RAM required and now the Jolla is unfortunately again limited to 1GB of RAM. In an OS that is geared towards true multi tasking, the RAM is really important compared to Android etc.

Does that mean I won't get the Jolla? No, I still want it as it looks the best thing but I won't be surprised with the device being limited by RAM (again)...
Its upto the developers to learn code and use less resourses and free memory/CPU.

If apps eating to much memory they are often broken piece of ****. Thats why I personally dont use windows as an example.

In case of N9 eating to much memory/resources my guess is one of those is that damn tracker daemon.

I am suprised that Linux geeks this days also has gone nuts about HW specs. Probadly brainwatched by Android and the need of > 2Gb RAM on a mobile. Its plain ridiculous. Its a phone for got sake. My personal server has around 1Gb and works nicely. And now people needs 2Gb on a phone!?

Ofcourse if you use several crappy Android apps the 1Gb is not enought but main reason to buy an Jolla is not Android. Those people buying Jolla because of Android will be disapointed.
__________________
Keep safe and healthy

Last edited by mikecomputing; 2013-10-03 at 20:05.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post:
shanttu's Avatar
Posts: 234 | Thanked: 281 times | Joined on Nov 2010 @ Helsinki
#294
My two cents in discussion off RAM is based on my 4 years old Samsung N140. I upgraded RAM from 1gb to 2gb and it made no difference. My tasks are quite light, but that usage would be heavy when I operate with a smart phone. Ubuntu hardly ever takes even the 1gb. It's the Atom CPU that is limiting the performance on my netbook. I don't want to sound like a fanboy who is defending Jolla, but when discussing RAM usage I really cannot understand why some people just need moar specs.
__________________
Please avoid feeding the trolls.
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to shanttu For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,453 | Thanked: 20,983 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#295
Originally Posted by thedead1440 View Post
Let's not hide flaws and say 1gb is sufficient when the N9 has shown that on boot system libraries and apps/services itself take up 700MB of RAM.
I agree it is a design flaw. The N9's that is. For using so much. The 1GB laptop I mentioned a few posts up used about 120MB on boot. I ran heavy applications on it like GIMP, DVD Author and LibreOffice and never used more than 500MB. So why does a phone need 700MB?

Originally Posted by ggabriel View Post
EDIT: I stand corrected... you have to use "top" to see the amount cached, for some reason it isn't implemented in free (or maybe if you use bash instead of bb).
This comes from my N900. Does N9's free look different?
Code:
BusyBox v1.21.1 (Debian 1.21.1power1+thumb0) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.

~ $ free
             total         used         free       shared      buffers
Mem:        235252       229308         5944            0         2580
-/+ buffers:             226728         8524
Swap:       804856        86948       717908
~ $
Originally Posted by qwazix View Post
(long and comprehensive comparison of various phones' virtual keyboards)
My WiFi password contains only basic 7-bit ASCII characters but includes such stumbling blocks as the pipe (|) and backquote (`). I had no problems typing the whole thing on two Android devices but a friend's iPhone was an epic fail. After half an hour we gave up trying to figure out how to type the backquote. I ended up sending the password to the phone by SMS.

Last edited by pichlo; 2013-10-03 at 21:22.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#296
Originally Posted by shanttu View Post
My two cents in discussion off RAM is based on my 4 years old Samsung N140. I upgraded RAM from 1gb to 2gb and it made no difference. My tasks are quite light, but that usage would be heavy when I operate with a smart phone. Ubuntu hardly ever takes even the 1gb. It's the Atom CPU that is limiting the performance on my netbook. I don't want to sound like a fanboy who is defending Jolla, but when discussing RAM usage I really cannot understand why some people just need moar specs.
You don't need more space. Lumia 620 works great on 512 RAM. But Jolla claims multitasking abilities. Well....if you want to truly multitask you need RAM. The more the better. 1gb is not enough, as seen on n9 and n900. Both times the devices were underpowered..
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
biatch0's Avatar
Posts: 226 | Thanked: 195 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Malaysia
#297
I like how some people take things literally when the intended message is obvious... but nevermind.
 
Moderator | Posts: 6,215 | Thanked: 6,400 times | Joined on Nov 2011
#298
Mikecomputing,

Looks like you need a reading lesson because you keep spouting the same old about inefficient code when the two examples I gave you were of the system apps! Want more? Open 9 windows on grob, minimise them, receive a phone call and at the end of the phone call open contacts and attempt a message out. You see the fps dropping during the whole process! Want one more example? Search the forums and see posts of people complaining that when dpkg is installing something, all their running applications (sometimes only one or two are running) get closed. Know why? Because of out-of-memory... Want to keep blaming the poor coding still?


Pichlo, a desktop and a phone are different things. Why do we compare arm and x86 platforms RAM usage when the codes etc are different? Again I am not whining about 1GB of RAM but I am trying to illustrate to all those who keep saying 1GB is more than enough that the previous phone designed by the same team was limited by its RAM certainly and that was 2 years ago.

Now let's compare with the fruit phone. It doesn't have true multi tasking as we know hence it is able to allocate it's RAM usage better to foreground activities but on something like the N9 where you can exploit the full capabilities of the multi tasking OS, more than 1GB of RAM would make a huge difference...
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to thedead1440 For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,453 | Thanked: 20,983 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#299
Sure, ARM is not x86, but six times more RAM on idle? I maintain that this is the N9's fault.

Edit: If you really want to compare like for like, then I suggets booting the N9 to Debian or Ubuntu if there is such an option and checking the RAM use then. I can't as I do not have the N9.

Last edited by pichlo; 2013-10-04 at 06:36.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 771 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#300
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
Sure, ARM is not x86, but six times more RAM on idle? I maintain that this is the N9's fault.
imho, n9 fault were the slow processor and slow swap memory...makes application stays in background much longer than it should.
__________________
5800XMN8808N9
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03.