Active Topics

 


Poll: Delet the values from the speedpatch?
Poll Options
Delet the values from the speedpatch?

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#3011
how bad is the stutter with u ?
because 5.2 has no difference from other versions regarding to overclock-call

try removing it
if the stutter is gone that means batterypatch is causing it

if not
then my best guess would be setting recaller to autorecord if installed
 
Posts: 99 | Thanked: 80 times | Joined on Dec 2011 @ maemo
#3012
to those who say "battery patch doesnt save battery"
I made small test with same usage :
w/o battery patch it takes 8 hours to go down to 44%
with battery patch it takes 10 hours to go down to 70.1%
I used Qtbattery with bq27x00

Last edited by ravent-n900; 2012-02-14 at 15:47.
 
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#3013
thank you for doing such test
if i do it my self
none of *those guys* will believe

and btw can you please check if there is a ringing stutter problem? so i can fix it ASAP
 
Posts: 223 | Thanked: 79 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Lebanon- Beirut
#3014
no stutter for me.I'm using stable latest version.
But i have to say that previous versions were better than the last 2 versions of batterypatch.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ahmadamaj For This Useful Post:
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#3015
eh now i'm lost
would you explain why ?

and you mean with version 4.5 ?

personally i don't think so
because the latest one has 2 massively effective fixes

1- prevents cpu_sleep to be loaded multiple times while idle by checking vfs cache value which reduces the number of loads of cpu_sleep and improves the standby time
ex : the reply above yours

2-the call overclock which was staying on 720 or 700
now it stays only on 600
and after answering it switches to 250

everything else is the same as the previous versions
 
Posts: 223 | Thanked: 79 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Lebanon- Beirut
#3016
ok, maybe it's my phone. Because I did install nitdroid, and some other apps almost at the same as the update, so I didn't have the time to test older version with the new apps.
 
panjgoori's Avatar
Posts: 1,239 | Thanked: 1,278 times | Joined on Aug 2011 @ Balochistan
#3017
for me best version was 3.5. and also 5.2 is also good. saves battery very well. thanks for ur hardwork karam. really appreciate it.

and yes i have customized the overclock profile in testing version 4.2. there was a double stop ( between dsp rate and cpu voltage. replaced that with a comma (,) and now its great again. and i dont know about max cpu thing. changed that also by my self. thanks.
 
Posts: 61 | Thanked: 64 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ EU
#3018
Originally Posted by ravent-n900 View Post
to those who say "battery patch doesnt save battery"
I made small test with same usage :
w/o battery patch it takes 8 hours to go down to 44%
with battery patch it takes 10 hours to go down to 70.1%
I used Qtbattery with bq27x00
10 hours to go down to 70.1% is quite much. Without battery patch, and with KP49 and DSP profile, I am experiencing about 4-6 mAh consumption in standby, and this means maximum 60 mAh in 10 hours. If you take from maximum capacity of 1240 mAh, 60 mAh in 10 hours, this means without battery patch it takes 10 hours to go down to 95.1% !

Most probably in your case you have some applications that consume more than 4-6 mAh in standby which is not normal.

You can check easily the instant standby consumption with Desktop Commands as shown here: http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=713
 
Posts: 99 | Thanked: 80 times | Joined on Dec 2011 @ maemo
#3019
Originally Posted by yrannadx View Post
10 hours to go down to 70.1% is quite much. Without battery patch, and with KP49 and DSP profile, I am experiencing about 4-6 mAh consumption in standby, and this means maximum 60 mAh in 10 hours. If you take from maximum capacity of 1240 mAh, 60 mAh in 10 hours, this means without battery patch it takes 10 hours to go down to 95.1% !

Most probably in your case you have some applications that consume more than 4-6 mAh in standby which is not normal.

You can check easily the instant standby consumption with Desktop Commands as shown here: http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=713
not stand by im talking about normal use
 
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#3020
@yrannadx

in my case
full standby
each 24 hours | 10--> 13 % is gone

i had a chance to leave N900 for fully idle when i had tests in my school
5 days without charging
was left 45% of battery

PS : using any battery monitoring app will add an extra 4% of usage per 24 hours


@panjgoori
would you please upload the 3.5 version deb
i need to check it out

Last edited by karam; 2012-02-15 at 11:43.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
autobrick, awesome-script, do no install, f***epitaph, install it now, perfect_ n900, script-a-brick, very safe


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.