Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3091
Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
All the links that people are posting on here are NOT from Nokia so why will anyone believe?.
Swedish Nokia has said it and personally I beleive more in them than trolls like you.
 
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#3092
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
Swedish Nokia has said it and personally I beleive more in them than trolls like you.
Mike, swedish Nokia is there to sell (and repair) phones to people of Sweden. Anything they announce about availability of N9 is probably rock solid.

However, they can not vouch for the several years of support, because somebody else decides/decided on that.

One of the major reasons Apple is the biggest smart phone manufacturer today is "loyality" to/of the customer. IOS always supports last 2-3 devices. It means that people who bought iPhone 3GS, will most likely have latest ios, and continue to spend their money in apple store.

Keeping people to your platform is more important than selling a brand new cell phone.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to momcilo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3093
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
Mike, swedish Nokia is there to sell (and repair) phones to people of Sweden. Anything they announce about availability of N9 is probably rock solid.

However, they can not vouch for the several years of support, because somebody else decides/decided on that.

One of the major reasons Apple is the biggest smart phone manufacturer today is "loyality" to/of the customer. IOS always supports last 2-3 devices. It means that people who bought iPhone 3GS, will most likely have latest ios, and continue to spend their money in apple store.

Keeping people to your platform is more important than selling a brand new cell phone.
Again I beleive more in that than I belevieve trolls and whiners in this forum.

Just an example: there are plenty of people on this forum saying N900 is not supported this actually is false!

People also totaly forget the facts that both Symbian and soon S40 and Meego is using much of the same so called "ecosystem" in form of Qt. This was NOT the case of N900 and old symbian where both used totallyu different API.

So if all trolls here are right well then S40 is also not supported in the long run...

And Nokia goes WP for everything and well if trolöl here beleive this happens I must ROTFL.

Again there is no chance Nokia can go only WPx they need S40+Qt and Meego

Last edited by mikecomputing; 2011-07-31 at 17:20.
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#3094
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
Again I beleive more in that than I belevieve trolls and whiners in this forum.

Just an example: there are plenty of people on this forum saying N900 is not supported this actually is false!
Define support.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#3095
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
One of the major reasons Apple is the biggest smart phone manufacturer today is "loyality" to/of the customer. IOS always supports last 2-3 devices. It means that people who bought iPhone 3GS, will most likely have latest ios, and continue to spend their money in apple store.
It's possible a similar pattern could kick-in for N9, being the 1st truly commercial Maemo/MeeGo device they've released.

"If" Nokia doesn't continue to limit MeeGo's chances of getting traction...
Or "if" it gets enough traction regardless, so they decide to continue MeeGo (once /yr) alongside WP.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#3096
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Define support.
This should be interesting
 
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3097
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Define support.
The app framework (In this case Qt) and bugfixes.

That doesnt mean include latest Adobe Flash like some whiners here want on N900.
 
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#3098
Originally Posted by crisscross View Post
This quote from Elop himself should be proof enough:
"The N9 will be supported by Nokia in the years to come to ensure customers are well served."
http://mynokiablog.com/2011/07/31/st...e-elops-mouth/
I see he's spouting some of the same FUD he did at the beginning of the yr:
"MeeGo effort could not quickly enough deliver us a range of solutions across price points, radio technologies, etc. for us to effectively compete, so we had to make an alternative decision."

It's more vague this time....
But it looks like he's trying to cite: "MeeGo's inability to adapt quickly to diff. hardware platforms" again.

That was thoroughly debunked by one of his own employees.
http://felipec.wordpress.com/2011/06...elop-on-meego/

Some of his other argument for the switch held more water (kinda).
But he held-up this one as one of the single biggest reasons, which kinda undermines his integrity.

Last edited by jalyst; 2011-07-31 at 17:26.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#3099
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
I see he's spouting some of the same FUD he did at the beginning of the yr:
"MeeGo effort could not quickly enough deliver us a range of solutions across price points, radio technologies, etc. for us to effectively compete, so we had to make an alternative decision."

It's more vague this time....
But it looks like he's trying to cite: "MeeGo's inability to adapt quickly to diff. hardware platforms" again.

That was thoroughly debunked by one of his own employees.
http://felipec.wordpress.com/2011/06...elop-on-meego/

Some of his other argument for the switch held more water (kinda).
But he held-up this one as one of the single biggest reasons, which kinda undermines his integrity.
You kinda hit the nail then and i was thinking erlier, would we have a rebellion within Nokia if the employee's wanted to clearly support the N9?.
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#3100
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
The app framework (In this case Qt) and bugfixes.
Since the N9 and N900 both use the same ARM processor, not too surprised there. Don't forget that the N8x0's are no longer supported for Qt. Give it time, it will happen in that area as well for the lower spec'd N900.

But no MicroB updates is a problem - can't run Google+ well/at all. Modest is open source, but no major updates there. The WONTFIX issues aren't fixed on the N900.

I wouldn't call that support. It's just yet to be considered obsolete by the frameworks you mentioned. N810 can't go above Qt 4.5 (or 4.6, I forget) and yet it runs Qt.

I'd personally rethink using the term support.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy??????


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58.