Dave999
|
2011-08-01
, 11:25
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#3211
|
|
2011-08-01
, 13:13
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 431 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#3212
|
|
2011-08-01
, 13:39
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#3213
|
1) I agree that symbian should have been dropped earlier. I would like to have had another OS on my N8 - but there where no alternative. Nokia will not go to Android and which other OS should have been implemented? We may like the Maemo, but it is not mainstream enough and WP7 wasn't ready - Windows 6.5 well have anyone tried it? I had an HTC with it as business phone and honestly my N95 was used 99% of the time...
Maybe Nokia didn't put more focus on Meego because they could see where symbian was heading - symbian Anna and Belle will actually be ok - still not fancy but much more smooth and with better browser = more competitive and maybe even an alternative to iOS and Android.
However the development of Anna and Belle took forever which made N8, C7 ect a mid-end product - at best.
2) the stakeholders opinion with Nokia depends on WP7 devices - Meego doesn't matter (unfortunately)
|
2011-08-01
, 14:06
|
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 200 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Norway
|
#3214
|
The previous clue went out on Friday at 9PM BST. We will have more details on what's to come soon!
Will have more information on what's next soon. Stay tuned .
|
2011-08-01
, 14:09
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#3215
|
Judging from the history of Nokia it seems once they "left" symbian for Maemo it all went downhill from there so judging by the happenings from there on the problem was clear to see within there software dept as the root cause.
|
2011-08-01
, 14:20
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#3216
|
I don't think that makes any sense. Nokia never left symbian for Maemo. They almost left it for MeeGo, but even that attempt was terminated before it got to full speed.
The only thing Nokia has ever "left" Symbian for is WP.
|
2011-08-01
, 14:37
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#3217
|
I am not sure what came first with Nokia, MeeGo or Maemo but as they brought out the Maemo os i would hazard a guess and say Maemo was in the pipeline first.
|
2011-08-01
, 14:48
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#3218
|
Dan/Gerbick/et al, here's one for you to get stuck into, if you feel like it:
http://forum.meego.com/showthread.php?p=27038#post27038
Never been a fan of QGil's vague comments seemingly suggesting;
UX is all that matters, OSS underpinnings can go away, & Nokia can easily transfer any MeeGo goodness to WP/S40.
Granted most of his comments on this matter are usually very vague, so he could mean something else entirely.
One of his blog posts suggested something slightly different, but was still open to interpretation.
Abill... are you still trying to be clueless? Naughty boy!
I'm going to give you a slap on the wrist if you don't stop soon
|
2011-08-01
, 14:52
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#3219
|
I am looking at the events between Maemo and now.
MeeGo is not out yet as you know.
EDIT if you notice i said "left" not left.
|
2011-08-01
, 14:59
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#3220
|
Fair enough.
Noticed, but I felt the way you continued your text kind of nullified the quotes. No offence.
Tags |
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy?????? |
|