Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3221
Originally Posted by Brock View Post
as i understood, nokia planned to show the dev device at the conference but meego.com didnt wanted to show something at the conference that is not a real meego product (correct me if i am wrong).

And thats what i dont understand because it would be a great benefit for meego if they could show something (anything) for meego..

source: http://maemo.org/community/council/c...date-may_2011/

"It was apparent that Nokia had wanted the device to be certified as MeeGo compliant in time for the conference but that discussions on this topic had not been resolved."

I just say this:

This just proves that Elop has succed to trash the Meego community totally

Now there is open war between Maemo/Meego and opensource Intel vs Nokia and the only winner is Microsoft again and the the open source and the engineer working on Maemo Harmattan and Meego as community fails more and more :-(

I said this on february and say it again: This is exactly what Elop and Microsoft want to happen

Instead of fight Microsoft, the Linux community fights about Maemo and Meego and what should be merged wtf

Last edited by mikecomputing; 2011-05-31 at 15:31.
 
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3222
Originally Posted by kanishou View Post
It is also pretty irrelevant though, and definitely not causing any delays.

Don't forget that MeeGo is basically Intel's Moblin for Netbooks merged with Nokia's Maemo for Smartphones.

Maemo is the real thing, no matter what Intel's attitude is or what it will ultimately be called.

Personally, I still can't quite imagine how the branding will work out in the end. Maemo is not MeeGo, but it is based on shared MeeGo technologies. Any attempts to unify the UXs is bound to fail in my opinion, at least without watering down what Nokia has been working on.

As a common technology base, I find the MeeGo style and branding a bit inappropriate. But I really don't know what is going on with that, just my personal views.
Yes Meego will FAIL without Maemo IMHO. Problem is that what shall Nokia say too the consumers if theyr not even allowed to call it Meego compatible?

I mean who will buy it? Except us who loves N900. That is very risky in a already shacking Nokia boat :-(

Too mee its obvious Meego needs Maemo Harmattan! But it looks to me Intel doesnt give a **** atm. Maybe they dont care about Meego future anyway?

They have a planB Android anyway.

In a way I can uunderstand Intel but at the same time its plain stupid war going on.

Both companys are LOOSERS!
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#3223
Originally Posted by Verythrax View Post
what could me plan 18?
Not just 18, but 18K. All new Symbian phones will be gold plated. That way, should the looming switch to Windows Phone 7 crush the flagging Symbian ecosystem even earlier than expected, well, at least you can get a buck or two from one of those "we buy gold" outfits.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Posts: 435 | Thanked: 197 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#3224
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
...To me its obvious Meego needs Maemo Harmattan! But it looks to me Intel doesnt give a **** atm.
How exactly does Intel have a say in that? (I'd just like to know) Cuz I thought MeeGo didn't technically "belong" to anybody
 

The Following User Says Thank You to IsaacDFP For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3225
Originally Posted by xerxes2 View Post
Your device MUST be MeeGo compliant to be allowed to be branded as such and as Harmattan CLEARLY is not they have recieved a negative answer on their request.
We has discussed this before and now I know it is not "compliant"


But question is are the allowed to call it Meego compatible? The plan was they were until february? But now its seems theyre not even allowed to call it that hows stupid is that!?

Just looks like a childish war between Nokia and Intel IMHO. And that will hurt the community thats for sure
 
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3226
Originally Posted by xerxes2 View Post
As the rumour says that the matter is not resolved make your own conclusions.



IMHO this means a negative answer, as it should be.

Edit: And the TSG should make this clear for everybody. IE Asus just announced a MeeGo branded netbook and I hope that it is MeeGo compliant and so forth.

Edit2: And it's REALLY irritating that Nokia are asking the TSG to make an exception for Harmattan. They should dump Maemo and move over to MeeGo asap instead of spending time whining.
Wrong Meego need Harmattan on handset! Meego is only halfway to succes.

Soo far I havents seen ANY working handset for Meego. So stop this bullish about dishing Maemo!
 
Posts: 64 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on May 2011
#3227
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
What makes it appear that way?
this link

http://noknok.tv/2011/05/31/meego-1-...ured-nokia-n9/

btw the thread has again drifted off topic so i will give away one tidbit of info i got from eldar to set things straight and this thread abuzz again .
if nokia n9 is only one meego phone that nokia is gonna release then Eldar murtazin who had seen the h/w has already replied that it is quiet old as compared to newer windows phone or android devices !!!
IF HOWEVER there is another meego phone having better h/w then nokia might have its recognition saved.
 
xerxes2's Avatar
Posts: 513 | Thanked: 651 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Sweden
#3228
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
Yes, Quim spoke with the maemo.org Community Council for a few minutes during lunch one day during the conference. Most of the conversation was devoted to thoughts on where Harmattan device users will go to find community.

Quim's few sentences on the Harmattan device and the open question of whether it becomes accepted as MeeGo were said with almost a shrug. He certainly didn't come across as whining or complaining.
But why the heck is he still talking about it? Harmattan is clearly not MeeGo compliant (or compatible for that matter) so why go on whining about it? Enough already! The TSG should just tell Nokia to STFU and that no means no.
__________________
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).
 
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3229
Originally Posted by xerxes2 View Post
Yes I do. And who says that the TSG haven't given Nokia an answer? Maybe someone should ask the TSG what is going on? What is there to discuss? It's been clear for years that Harmattan is based on Maemo so why would this simple matter not have been resolved a long time ago? Why are qgil still whining about it? It seems to be Nokia that think that the matter is not resolved yet but the TSG might have already given them a straight NO a long time ago? And Nokia just keep on whining about it.



Again what is there to discuss? I don't get it. Harmattan is not MeeGo compliant so it must be a very easy call to make.
Problem is Intel who has decided most of whats shall be included in Meego seems to not be intrested in ANYTHIONG comming from Maemo. So the compliance spec is just bigfail anyway.

Why the freak isnt QtMobility included as compliance spec as an example. And the evoution vs Track war that started after MrFlop decision?

To mee its abvious Intel dictates the compliancespec.
 
xerxes2's Avatar
Posts: 513 | Thanked: 651 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Sweden
#3230
Originally Posted by IsaacDFP View Post
How exactly does Intel have a say in that? (I'd just like to know) Cuz I thought MeeGo didn't technically "belong" to anybody
IIRC the MeeGo TSG consists of three persons, one from LF, one from Intel and one from Nokia. The Nokia dude did however move to Intel after Elopocalypse so suddenly Nokia didn't have any vote at all.
__________________
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xerxes2 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:37.