nilchak
|
2009-10-30
, 13:42
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#321
|
|
2009-10-30
, 14:01
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#322
|
Just look at how the E71 has over taken the blackberries, the E72 will be a big hit. The N96 is a top notch candybar and they WILL sell shed loads of X6s and N97 minis and the open sourcing of Symbian is already bringing more OEMs on board.
It's also Android, which means you're not going to be able to run emacs except remotely via ssh.
|
2009-10-30
, 14:47
|
|
Posts: 143 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Abuja, Nigeria
|
#323
|
|
2009-10-30
, 15:28
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#324
|
My point is as hardware improves, Maemo/Linux will run on nearly anything. More and more users will expect a more 'desktop' type of experience.
. . .
What I'm saying above is what Nokia 'gets'. The pocket desktop computer is the future.
|
2009-10-30
, 16:03
|
|
Posts: 1,589 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Arlington (DFW), Texas
|
#325
|
|
2009-10-30
, 16:26
|
Posts: 151 |
Thanked: 135 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
|
#326
|
|
2009-10-30
, 16:49
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#327
|
I wonder if your arguments about Maemo vs. Symbian also perhaps apply to Android and the iPhoneOS. I know that Android has a lot of room for growth and development, but I can't help feeling that the whole constraints of the java-layer thing were determined by the smartphone concept and technology ca. 2007.
As pocket computers get cheaper, powerful, and ubiquitous, people are going to want the power and flexibility they've come to expect in desktop computers (including the ability to run and port programs written in a variety of languages). Maemo is well poised to take advantage of the pocket computer model. I wonder whether the tightly controlled, "single language" environments of Android and iPhoneOS and PalmPre will come to seem outdated in five years. Perhaps Maemo is showing us the future high-end, while Android and iPhoneOS are the future mid- to low- range (i.e., what Symbian is today).
|
2009-10-30
, 17:00
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#328
|
I've never owned a Symbian phone so that possible outcome doesn't bother me. Maemo/Linux is so powerful and adaptable it seems clearly more capable of growing along with future technology so I see such an outcome as a Good Thing. But I can understand it might bring some sadness to longtime old-school Symbian people. Some Windoze users still wish for a DOS comeback too. Sometimes ya just gotta move on...
|
2009-10-30
, 17:23
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#329
|
The mistake many people seem to be making is assuming the N900 would be the product which would launch Maemo to the mainstream stardom, In-fact that is actually not the way Nokia has planned it. N900 ( and Maemo 5 ) is suppose to be a precursor to N920 (Maemo 6) which is suppose to be the first mainstream ready Maemo based device. Right now Nokia is being cautious and is trying to down play the average user play expectation the N900 phone. Most of the things learnt with the launch of the N900 would be used in making N920 a super consumer ready phone. The N920 is suppose to be the N900 + ( capacity screen, Multi-touch, Qt + etc )
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-30
, 18:45
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#330
|
Not that I disagree with everything you wrote but N96 was pretty much a failure.
.
Tags |
comparison, competition, droid, fight, milestone, motorola droid, motorola milestone, n900, nokia n900 |
|