The Following User Says Thank You to w00t For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-11
, 21:33
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#322
|
Hi,
Quick suggestion (warning: I haven't actually used fapman yet myself as I don't install stuff all that often) - which would take some work, but.. - have you considered an attempt at integrating fapman in with maemo.org a bit? Being able to rate applications, view ratings, etc.. would doubtless help the extras-testing queue speed I think.
I'd be (cautiously) optimistic about throwing some of my time into this. Cautiously because I don't have a lot of it.
The Following User Says Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-12
, 08:13
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 842 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#323
|
Quick suggestion (warning: I haven't actually used fapman yet myself as I don't install stuff all that often) - which would take some work, but.. - have you considered an attempt at integrating fapman in with maemo.org a bit? Being able to rate applications, view ratings, etc.. would doubtless help the extras-testing queue speed I think.
I think fapman should hook up with KISStester and see what spawns
|
2010-08-13
, 20:01
|
|
Posts: 365 |
Thanked: 98 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#324
|
|
2010-08-13
, 20:05
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#325
|
Since attila77 is already working on KISStester, I don't feel the need to duplicate the functionality in fapman. And even reusing the code would require some work as fapman is c++ and kisstester is python... They are better as separate apps.
Edit: They could have a dependency on each other and communicate using dbus if necessary, I guess.
Yes, I though about similar things, too, but let's get this operational and smooth, then we can think about integration (premature optimization is the root of all evil, eh ?).
...
I welcome integration with other tools that can help streamlining the process (I will probably provide some way of command-line invocation that would take you straight to the vote dialog).
|
2010-08-14
, 00:25
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#326
|
|
2010-08-17
, 17:43
|
Posts: 73 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#327
|
|
2010-08-18
, 06:04
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#328
|
|
2010-08-18
, 11:08
|
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Stuttgart, Germany
|
#329
|
|
2010-08-18
, 11:30
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#330
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rob1n For This Useful Post: | ||
Quick suggestion (warning: I haven't actually used fapman yet myself as I don't install stuff all that often) - which would take some work, but.. - have you considered an attempt at integrating fapman in with maemo.org a bit? Being able to rate applications, view ratings, etc.. would doubtless help the extras-testing queue speed I think.
I'd be (cautiously) optimistic about throwing some of my time into this. Cautiously because I don't have a lot of it.
i'm a Qt expert and former Jolla sailor (forever sailing, in spirit).
if you like, read more about me.
if you find me entertaining, or useful, thank me. if you don't, then tell me why.