The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-18
, 00:15
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#322
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Wizard of Huz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-18
, 23:23
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 260 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#323
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to chainsawbike For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-19
, 03:52
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#324
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Wizard of Huz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-19
, 20:01
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#325
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-19
, 20:12
|
|
Posts: 257 |
Thanked: 2,053 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#326
|
*or*, even harder, using something thicker as replacement for white layer.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dos1 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-21
, 04:19
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#327
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Wizard of Huz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-25
, 00:18
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#328
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-25
, 01:45
|
|
Posts: 694 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#329
|
![]() |
2013-11-25
, 13:10
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#330
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
antenna, backcover, external, gangam_style, mugen cover, n900 body, neo900, sarcasm, where is estel |
|
As for GSM, yes, I've done tests - in city areas there is 0 difference, in rural area with only one strong Node B signal is a little weaker if we face it *directly* with the alu backcover, and a similar *increase* in signal strength when we face it rotated 180 degrees (i.e. with alu backcover positioned like "reflector" behind N900 internals). None seemed to change anything in practice.
I have booked (and payed) more professional signal ratio tests for body replacement phase, when it will be ready for such tests.
---
As for scanning N900's body, it would surely help a lot. As I've said earlier in this thread in answers to PEB's similar query (sadly, he never managed to finish that 3D scanning job), plain STL file format would do best - it should be least problematic for you to obtain and for me to work on (STL is supported by most FOSS CAD programs, and, more importantly, it is only one format for 3D with really good support in FOSS CAM g-code converters).
There is absolutely no problem with every part being scanned as separate file - of course, if you have skills and time it would be even better to have everything combined + separate files as addition, but, as I don't have access for 3D scanner, I'll accept basically whatever you may throw at me
Thanks again,
/Estel
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!