Reply
Thread Tools
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#3361
Originally Posted by zehjotkah View Post
Not going to happen
My father always said I could never tell who told truth; only time told the full truth. I'm patient.

I have "changed" my statement once. At the moment I was informed that there won't be a distribution of the Harmattan Developer Device at the MeeGo Conference.
And the screen. That changed too... just saying.

Together with that new information I classified my original source as either wrong or too slow, so I basically said that you should take my other information with a grain of salt.
Time will tell... I'm not judging either way personally.

and I just asked if he is serious. I think a justified question when he basically said that nobody would stop Apple from dominating the world.
I know. Had to slip that one back at you

Besides, we all know that Apple already rules the world.
 
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#3362
Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
you said RM680 is probably a N7 running symbian , now post you facts to back it up.
btw don't make fun of my English when based on your last couple of posts you do not know the different between which and what.
again, you are misquoting me

Originally Posted by misterc View Post
[...]
btw, could be the N7 (X breeding between N8 & E7)..[...]
i know i'm getting on your nerves with my long posts, but if you are not willing to take the time to read them, please don't reply to them.
this in fact simply proves that you dissect every single one of my post & jump on every word or term you find & try to prove i'm wrong...
know what? i don't even want to be right. but i'm willing to accept & apologize if & when i'm wrong.
are you?

my post

Originally Posted by misterc View Post
E7 (a business phone) has hw keyboard.
T7 seems indeed to be a cheaper N8 (and without hw kbd)

N7 would be (at least) E7 + mSDHC slot
thus including the hw kbd, as RM-680 / FCC seems to have
to which you replied

Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
T7 & N7 do not exist where is your info coming from?
(added the RED now)

do i say IS?
or do i say seems to be and would be ?

to explicit what i mean, seems and would explicit that the statement either might be difficult to prove
(i made a quick Google search for "nokia t7" when replying to onethreealpha but did NOT find a NOKIA page like for the N8, thus i said seems to be)
or are speculative
( i realised from onethreealpha post that the N7 reference was ambiguous and thus explicated that it was a fictive device, would be).

what should i prove?

Last edited by misterc; 2011-06-01 at 15:24.
 
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 738 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#3363
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
My father always said I could never tell who told truth; only time told the full truth.
Only time will tell if your father told you the truth
 

The Following User Says Thank You to erendorn For This Useful Post:
Verythrax's Avatar
Posts: 190 | Thanked: 167 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Brazil
#3364
 
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#3365
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
My father always said I could never tell who told truth; only time told the full truth. I'm patient.
Your father is right.

Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
And the screen. That changed too... just saying.
I never said that the screen resolution *IS* 1280x720. I just hinted in this direction. Later I said that it *IS* higher than the N900 ones, without specifying any resolution. I made this change to not build up any expectations which might not fullfilled. Unfortunately I can't test the resolution on my own because I never had the consumer device.

Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
I know. Had to slip that one back at you
You mean person, you!

Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Besides, we all know that Apple already rules the world.
Do we know that? Interesting.

Stopped reading after "Eldar..."

Last edited by zehjotkah; 2011-06-01 at 15:32.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
zapotek's Avatar
Posts: 185 | Thanked: 85 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Athens Greece
#3366
zehjotkah Stopped reading after "Eldar..."

lol good one
 

The Following User Says Thank You to zapotek For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3367
Originally Posted by zehjotkah View Post
the Harmattan device will be first.


until yesterdays announcement I would agree but now I am not sure...
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#3368
Originally Posted by zehjotkah View Post
I never said that the screen resolution *IS* 1280x720. I just hinted in this direction. Later I said that it *IS* higher than the N900 ones, without specifying any resolution. I made this change to not build up any expectations which might not fullfilled. Unfortunately I can't test the resolution on my own because I never had the consumer device.
Strange to have something in your possession but not have any means to compare it. Not saying you didn't compare it, or that you had it - in fact, hell... I'm not sure what you've admitted to as opposed to the string of hints - but let's put it out there. Hints and comments aren't confirmations.

Without those, patience is the best policy.

Do we know that? Interesting.
Anytime you have self-installing malware on your OS; that's a sign you're on top. Thought you knew that!

Regardless... keep hinting. Let's see how accurate you are. All I can confirm is that the next Nokia device will have the word "Nokia" on it.

That's all I got.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3369
Originally Posted by colin.stephane View Post
Does someone can kill the designer of this one ??? !!!

A++
Nice Wp7 phone I will buy it ;-)
 
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 161 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#3370
if its true, what eldar is insinuating, then it would be one of the biggest SEC investigations in US history. theres no way Elop would get away with devaluing stock 40% (purchase price is based on market cap and a % over the current value of the company stock) and then selling it to a company whose stocks he hasnt completely divested himself from.

based on this MS doesnt need all of that they have enough antitrust issues to deal with than to create a fuster cluck like this.

so, it makes little sense.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shady For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:39.