Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (8)
to Nokia N900 by whayong - 8 hrs, 14 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 4 hrs ago - more...
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Koajwujwer123 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-03
, 05:09
|
|
Posts: 43 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ /dev/ttyS0
|
#3572
|
Originally Posted by nilchak
The integration should be able to be supplemented via api's and plugins. The voip integration is neat, but the ovi maps "integration" is not. I would much prefer to be able to specify which of the many nav apps I have installed to get the address I click on in my contacts list. But I can't, since I'm stuck with that integration.
I thing both yourself and the parent poster completly missed the point.
The fact that Skype was integrated into the N900 didnt mean that I had to enable the skype account at all if I choose not to. Its all plugins based. So if you didnt use Skye it wouldnt show as an ption on the man communication panel.
Same goes with FB and Twitter integration I bet. If I dont use FB, i would not enable that option and hence nothing to bug you all the time. Make your choise. And THEN there may be other 3rd part apps (standalone) which you may choose to install. THAT is choise.
Nokia (Meego) isnt saying you HVE to use the integrated options.
I think everything that is related should *communicate*, but not be hard integrated.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to morbid For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-06-03
, 05:11
|
|
Posts: 233 |
Thanked: 516 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#3573
|
Originally Posted by The Wizard of Huz
Depending on how you look at it it will be a super phone well beyond the specs at least. Nice 8MP CZ camera , nice pic. Big screen , massive memory. UI , gestures , slim and of coures the great OS on it.
I agree. But none has all. Not good for the bottom line I guess. Why no E7 type of device with N8 camera? The N900 was as close as something can come to a super phone. Hopefully the Harmattan device will be a super phone.
|
|
2011-06-03
, 05:13
|
|
Posts: 233 |
Thanked: 516 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#3574
|
Originally Posted by jakiman
Yes yes. Not like Andro / WP . You do not have necessary to use those services~ ! Optional so don't worry too much.
Correct. Integrated doesn't mean forced. It should just mean that it's there if you want to use it. Isn't this what K123 basically is implying anyways? I doubt Nokia Harmattan device will be any different. I don't get how someone could complain about it being integrated here when N900 already is like that. =P
| The Following User Says Thank You to Koajwujwer123 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-06-03
, 05:49
|
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#3575
|
Originally Posted by Koajwujwer123
Interesting information. You mention "massive memory". So you obviously know how much RAM it has. I personally wouldn't call 512MB RAM "massive". So I can only guess it's at least 768MB RAM. (I really hope you are not referring it to internal storage of 64GB as "memory"......or are you....?)
Depending on how you look at it it will be a super phone well beyond the specs at least. Nice 8MP CZ camera , nice pic. Big screen , massive memory. UI , gestures , slim and of coures the great OS on it.
|
|
2011-06-03
, 05:52
|
|
Posts: 233 |
Thanked: 516 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#3576
|
Originally Posted by jakiman
yes for that. well i no know exact but no problem at all multitasking full webpages , apps , music etc etc. internal memory is also lot.
Interesting information. You mention "massive memory". So you obviously know how much RAM it has. I personally wouldn't call 512MB RAM "massive". So I can only guess it's at least 768MB RAM. (I really hope you are not referring it to internal storage of 64GB as "memory"......or are you....?)
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Koajwujwer123 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-06-03
, 06:54
|
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#3577
|
Originally Posted by morbid
So, it doesn't have integrated facebook, GTalk and skype support? It doesn't have a twitter widget?
I think you completely missed what he was saying... one of the benefits of open source is choices. To me, the N900 was a minimalistic linux install and I could take it from there (very ideal).
No integrated twitter client to annoy me...
though I could choose to install one if I wanted. If I wanted a facebook client, I could choose from several, etc....
I am sure you could apt-get remove the packages that offend you.
| The Following User Says Thank You to buchanmilne For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-06-03
, 08:54
|
|
Posts: 490 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Hannover-Germany-EU-Earth
|
#3578
|
Originally Posted by buchanmilne
what he means is that all social networks are implemented in the ui, so you dont need a special widget or app to use it (like the messages function in the n900, you dont need e.g. skype client because you can use the out -of-the-box skype ability)
So, it doesn't have integrated facebook, GTalk and skype support? It doesn't have a twitter widget?
all social networks? no, not all... icq support is missing... but wait... it has aim implemented which is compatible...
__________________
-under construction-
-under construction-
Last edited by Brock; 2011-06-03 at 09:10.
|
|
2011-06-03
, 09:51
|
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#3579
|
Originally Posted by Brock
So, would he prefer not to have the Messages UI on N900, because it allows / forces him to use Facebook chat (or twitter via a telepathy plugin), and instead have a primitive SMS-only replacement?
what he means is that all social networks are implemented in the ui, so you dont need a special widget or app to use it (like the messages function in the n900, you dont need e.g. skype client because you can use the out -of-the-box skype ability)
 |
|
2011-06-03
, 10:03
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#3580
|
Originally Posted by The Wizard of Huz
Dude, where did I say that was the only reason? It is one argument that you were overlooking/denying. You need a way to distribute a virus, and that's harder with a 1% market share than with a 70% market share.
That is not the ONLY reason but if you want to believe that keep believing it. Sure. That is obviously also the reason that there are no linux virussus. Most servers run linux on the internet.
Anyway, if linux servers are so secure, why is it called root kits and not administrator kits? There are different threats for different systems. Since Linux boxes have a high percentage on web servers and a low percentage on desktops, the threats towards Linux boxes have a different focus than Outlook viruses. On Linux, there are worms too, bots and egg drops and what not. Any system that is online, needs to be updated regularly, and it's always a struggle against the time.
Last edited by volt; 2011-06-03 at 10:11.
 |
| Tags |
| duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:45.
Pardon my English please.