The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to quipper8 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 19:21
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#3662
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 19:48
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#3663
|
Actually... I have to disagree fully with you. If Nokia USA was able to still accept and process orders, instead of closing up and leaving their sales to Amazon... then Nokia would have still had a process to accept payments, distribute the N9 just as they had with with Nokia N9.
Very little to do with the US cellphone carriers. They've not sold subsidized N-series phones since the crippled N73 by AT&T. But Nokia's decision to shut down Nokia USA and Nokia Canada means that the phone invariably will not be distributed by Nokia directly, nor via US carrier. That's how it's been here in this North American market.
But Nokia is at fault. They should have better sales distribution avenues and they do not.
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 19:57
|
Posts: 241 |
Thanked: 324 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#3664
|
No theyar are not cause Microsoft controls Nokia in the US...
And I begin to realise this is what Elop is talking about when he bashing about WP7.
Means Symbian/Meego will still be alive in european and WP7. Cause they know it will take some time before they actually have brainwatched US consumers. And when that is done european is next to try.
Still I think they will fail
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 20:12
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#3665
|
Yes they are, Microsoft does not CONTROL Nokia. Nokia controls ITSELF, but is going to be 100% reliant on Microsoft's OS in the US market. This reliance has nothing to do with the carrier relationships or distribution. Less availability of devices means much less sales. It's as simple as that. US being as 'carrier run' as it is doesn't bode well with Nokia's unsubsidized strategy that they have employed for so long in the US.
You keep wishing for WP7 to fail. Keep in mind, if WP7 fails.....Nokia fails. So yea.... :/
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 20:23
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ NJ
|
#3666
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jcar302 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 20:28
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#3667
|
I am sure this information has at least something to do with such decisions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._phones_in_use
And US is kind of tapped out already with 96%. US Market is over, Nokia knows it lost, on to greener pastures.
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 20:35
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ North Carolina (Formerly Denmark and Iceland)
|
#3668
|
Out of curiosity, if there truly isn't a US version of the n9, what are warranty options on an import?
Are we just screwed if it breaks?
Seriously affects if and when i purchase. If it's impossible to warranty, that may be a deal breaker, i certainly wouldn't be an early adopter, that's for sure.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to olighak For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-08-09
, 20:41
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#3669
|
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-08-09
, 20:47
|
Posts: 1,873 |
Thanked: 4,529 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ North Potomac MD
|
#3670
|
i'm starting to think if it will be worth it for me to even get the n9. I really want the phone but now I have to import it, pay a crazy amount and know that in a few months there will be a new android with better specs.
n900 till it commits suicide and than i'll think about what to get.
The Following User Says Thank You to mscion For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy?????? |
|
Given above, in addition to the carrier subsidy model which often includes two year contracts, in addition to the preference of americans for iphones, it does seem the American market is saturated and of no real benefit to Nokia currently.
When verizon switches to LTE(which will operate more like GSM folks are accustomed to) and the carrier subsidy/contract model is defeated in the US, then Nokia may have a chance here.
In my opinion, Nokia is using a a type of cross-plot of carrier power(ie where people are more likely or not to buy or even be able to buy unlocked sim free devices) on one axis and market potential on another axis in deciding where to market and release such a device as the n9.
Anyway, I too wish that it would be easier for me to get an n9 here in the States, but I understand that it makes total business sense for Nokia to not worry setting up a channel here for the few sales they will receive.