|
2009-06-17
, 12:21
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#362
|
|
2009-06-20
, 10:52
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#363
|
|
2009-06-20
, 12:10
|
Posts: 968 |
Thanked: 974 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Ohio
|
#364
|
|
2009-06-20
, 17:23
|
Posts: 43 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Las Vegas
|
#365
|
|
2009-06-22
, 13:37
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#366
|
|
2009-06-22
, 13:44
|
Posts: 43 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Las Vegas
|
#367
|
|
2009-06-22
, 15:40
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Florida
|
#368
|
|
2009-06-22
, 20:42
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#369
|
|
2009-06-28
, 00:23
|
Posts: 276 |
Thanked: 37 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#370
|
Assuming you are using the OSM maps, and looks like you are, this is an issue with the way places happen to be tagged.
I know it's a rubbish answer to say 'go fix the map data' but unfortunately a lot of the map data was inserted without much thought to routing/searching.
I believe the way it works is effectively it builds a tree for search, Europe->uk->towns then any street within some arbitary threshold of a town is deemed to belong to that town. Personally I think the whole thing needs a much better, specific design. But it is what it is. In order for a town to show up in search it requries some tags that identify it as is_in Europe, is_in uk is_in county...etc
To fix, get an account signed up with OSM, and go use the web editor to look at a node that you can find in search. and copy the tags. Or just look at Eastleigh (the town I mapped) it does now show up in searches, because I tagged it.
OSM map data is fantastic, and part of that is people helping by adding useful information to give it that amazing level of detail.